RELL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Richardson Electronics's net margin of 1.05%. Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36% beat Avnet's return on equity of 7.03%.

Richardson Electronics has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Avnet has an analysts' consensus of $54.17 which suggests that it could grow by 3.1%. Given that Richardson Electronics has higher upside potential than Avnet, analysts believe Richardson Electronics is more attractive than Avnet.

Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.384%.

Richardson Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Avnet offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Richardson Electronics pays 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues are $53.7M, which are smaller than Avnet quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K is lower than Avnet's net income of $59M. Notably, Richardson Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.18x while Avnet's PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Richardson Electronics is 1.08x versus 0.21x for Avnet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EACO has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Richardson Electronics's net margin of 6.72%. Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36% beat EACO's return on equity of 12.99%.

Richardson Electronics has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand EACO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Richardson Electronics has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Richardson Electronics is more attractive than EACO.

Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EACO has a beta of 0.018, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.239%.

Richardson Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. EACO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Richardson Electronics pays 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO pays out 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues are $53.7M, which are smaller than EACO quarterly revenues of $96.5M. Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K is lower than EACO's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Richardson Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.18x while EACO's PE ratio is 12.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Richardson Electronics is 1.08x versus 0.50x for EACO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parkervision has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Richardson Electronics's net margin of --. Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36% beat Parkervision's return on equity of --.

Richardson Electronics has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Parkervision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1066.8%. Given that Parkervision has higher upside potential than Richardson Electronics, analysts believe Parkervision is more attractive than Richardson Electronics.

Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parkervision has a beta of 2.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.084%.

Richardson Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Parkervision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Richardson Electronics pays 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Parkervision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues are $53.7M, which are larger than Parkervision quarterly revenues of --. Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K is higher than Parkervision's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Richardson Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.18x while Parkervision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Richardson Electronics is 1.08x versus -- for Parkervision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taitron Components has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Richardson Electronics's net margin of 20.64%. Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36% beat Taitron Components's return on equity of 7.88%.

Richardson Electronics has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Taitron Components has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Richardson Electronics has higher upside potential than Taitron Components, analysts believe Richardson Electronics is more attractive than Taitron Components.

Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taitron Components has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.899%.

Richardson Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Taitron Components offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Richardson Electronics pays 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components pays out 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues are $53.7M, which are larger than Taitron Components quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K is higher than Taitron Components's net income of $245K. Notably, Richardson Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.18x while Taitron Components's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Richardson Electronics is 1.08x versus 3.55x for Taitron Components. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.