EACO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet, Inc. has a net margin of 8.4% compared to EACO Corp.'s net margin of 0.98%. EACO Corp.'s return on equity of 23.61% beat Avnet, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.23%.

EACO Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avnet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could fall by -11.61%. Given that Avnet, Inc. has higher upside potential than EACO Corp., analysts believe Avnet, Inc. is more attractive than EACO Corp..

EACO Corp. has a beta of 0.079, which suggesting that the stock is 92.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet, Inc. has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.914%.

EACO Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avnet, Inc. offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. EACO Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet, Inc. pays out 48.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EACO Corp. quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Avnet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.3B. EACO Corp.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than Avnet, Inc.'s net income of $61.7M. Notably, EACO Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Avnet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO Corp. is 0.96x versus 0.22x for Avnet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a net margin of 8.4% compared to EACO Corp.'s net margin of -40.77%. EACO Corp.'s return on equity of 23.61% beat Littelfuse, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.85%.

EACO Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Littelfuse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $326.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.23%. Given that Littelfuse, Inc. has higher upside potential than EACO Corp., analysts believe Littelfuse, Inc. is more attractive than EACO Corp..

EACO Corp. has a beta of 0.079, which suggesting that the stock is 92.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Littelfuse, Inc. has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.038%.

EACO Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Littelfuse, Inc. offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. EACO Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse, Inc. pays out 67.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EACO Corp. quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Littelfuse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $593.9M. EACO Corp.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than Littelfuse, Inc.'s net income of -$242.1M. Notably, EACO Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Littelfuse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO Corp. is 0.96x versus 3.29x for Littelfuse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ParkerVision, Inc. has a net margin of 8.4% compared to EACO Corp.'s net margin of --. EACO Corp.'s return on equity of 23.61% beat ParkerVision, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

EACO Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ParkerVision, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4672.73%. Given that ParkerVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than EACO Corp., analysts believe ParkerVision, Inc. is more attractive than EACO Corp..

EACO Corp. has a beta of 0.079, which suggesting that the stock is 92.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParkerVision, Inc. has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.371%.

EACO Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ParkerVision, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EACO Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ParkerVision, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EACO Corp. quarterly revenues are $111M, which are larger than ParkerVision, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. EACO Corp.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than ParkerVision, Inc.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, EACO Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while ParkerVision, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO Corp. is 0.96x versus -- for ParkerVision, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics Ltd. has a net margin of 8.4% compared to EACO Corp.'s net margin of -0.23%. EACO Corp.'s return on equity of 23.61% beat Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.51%.

EACO Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Richardson Electronics Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.56%. Given that Richardson Electronics Ltd. has higher upside potential than EACO Corp., analysts believe Richardson Electronics Ltd. is more attractive than EACO Corp..

EACO Corp. has a beta of 0.079, which suggesting that the stock is 92.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics Ltd. has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.513%.

EACO Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Richardson Electronics Ltd. offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. EACO Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics Ltd. pays out 298.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

EACO Corp. quarterly revenues are $111M, which are larger than Richardson Electronics Ltd. quarterly revenues of $52.3M. EACO Corp.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s net income of -$121K. Notably, EACO Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO Corp. is 0.96x versus 0.76x for Richardson Electronics Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.