EACO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet has a net margin of 6.72% compared to EACO's net margin of 1.05%. EACO's return on equity of 12.99% beat Avnet's return on equity of 7.03%.

EACO has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avnet has an analysts' consensus of $54.17 which suggests that it could grow by 3.1%. Given that Avnet has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Avnet is more attractive than EACO.

EACO has a beta of 0.018, which suggesting that the stock is 98.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.384%.

EACO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avnet offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. EACO pays 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EACO quarterly revenues are $96.5M, which are smaller than Avnet quarterly revenues of $5.6B. EACO's net income of $6.5M is lower than Avnet's net income of $59M. Notably, EACO's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Avnet's PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO is 0.50x versus 0.21x for Avnet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parkervision has a net margin of 6.72% compared to EACO's net margin of --. EACO's return on equity of 12.99% beat Parkervision's return on equity of --.

EACO has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Parkervision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1066.8%. Given that Parkervision has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Parkervision is more attractive than EACO.

EACO has a beta of 0.018, which suggesting that the stock is 98.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parkervision has a beta of 2.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.084%.

EACO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parkervision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EACO pays 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Parkervision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EACO's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EACO quarterly revenues are $96.5M, which are larger than Parkervision quarterly revenues of --. EACO's net income of $6.5M is higher than Parkervision's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, EACO's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Parkervision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO is 0.50x versus -- for Parkervision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics has a net margin of 6.72% compared to EACO's net margin of 1.1%. EACO's return on equity of 12.99% beat Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36%.

EACO has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Richardson Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that Richardson Electronics has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Richardson Electronics is more attractive than EACO.

EACO has a beta of 0.018, which suggesting that the stock is 98.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.148%.

EACO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Richardson Electronics offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. EACO pays 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics pays out 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

EACO quarterly revenues are $96.5M, which are larger than Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues of $53.7M. EACO's net income of $6.5M is higher than Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K. Notably, EACO's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Richardson Electronics's PE ratio is 38.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO is 0.50x versus 1.08x for Richardson Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taitron Components has a net margin of 6.72% compared to EACO's net margin of 20.64%. EACO's return on equity of 12.99% beat Taitron Components's return on equity of 7.88%.

EACO has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taitron Components has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EACO has higher upside potential than Taitron Components, analysts believe EACO is more attractive than Taitron Components.

EACO has a beta of 0.018, which suggesting that the stock is 98.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taitron Components has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.899%.

EACO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taitron Components offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. EACO pays 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components pays out 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EACO quarterly revenues are $96.5M, which are larger than Taitron Components quarterly revenues of $1.2M. EACO's net income of $6.5M is higher than Taitron Components's net income of $245K. Notably, EACO's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.01x while Taitron Components's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EACO is 0.50x versus 3.55x for Taitron Components. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.