ARW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EACO has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Arrow Electronics's net margin of 6.72%. Arrow Electronics's return on equity of 8.39% beat EACO's return on equity of 12.99%.

Arrow Electronics has a consensus price target of $127.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand EACO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arrow Electronics has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Arrow Electronics is more attractive than EACO.

Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.263, which suggesting that the stock is 26.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EACO has a beta of 0.018, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.239%.

Arrow Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EACO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arrow Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EACO pays out 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arrow Electronics quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than EACO quarterly revenues of $96.5M. Arrow Electronics's net income of $100.6M is higher than EACO's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Arrow Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while EACO's PE ratio is 12.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arrow Electronics is 0.22x versus 0.50x for EACO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parkervision has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Arrow Electronics's net margin of --. Arrow Electronics's return on equity of 8.39% beat Parkervision's return on equity of --.

Arrow Electronics has a consensus price target of $127.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Parkervision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1066.8%. Given that Parkervision has higher upside potential than Arrow Electronics, analysts believe Parkervision is more attractive than Arrow Electronics.

Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.263, which suggesting that the stock is 26.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parkervision has a beta of 2.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.084%.

Arrow Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parkervision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arrow Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parkervision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arrow Electronics quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Parkervision quarterly revenues of --. Arrow Electronics's net income of $100.6M is higher than Parkervision's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Arrow Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Parkervision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arrow Electronics is 0.22x versus -- for Parkervision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Arrow Electronics's net margin of 1.1%. Arrow Electronics's return on equity of 8.39% beat Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -0.36%.

Arrow Electronics has a consensus price target of $127.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Richardson Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that Arrow Electronics has higher upside potential than Richardson Electronics, analysts believe Arrow Electronics is more attractive than Richardson Electronics.

Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.263, which suggesting that the stock is 26.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.148%.

Arrow Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Richardson Electronics offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Arrow Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics pays out 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Arrow Electronics quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues of $53.7M. Arrow Electronics's net income of $100.6M is higher than Richardson Electronics's net income of $590K. Notably, Arrow Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Richardson Electronics's PE ratio is 38.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arrow Electronics is 0.22x versus 1.08x for Richardson Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taitron Components has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Arrow Electronics's net margin of 20.64%. Arrow Electronics's return on equity of 8.39% beat Taitron Components's return on equity of 7.88%.

Arrow Electronics has a consensus price target of $127.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Taitron Components has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arrow Electronics has higher upside potential than Taitron Components, analysts believe Arrow Electronics is more attractive than Taitron Components.

Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.263, which suggesting that the stock is 26.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taitron Components has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.899%.

Arrow Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taitron Components offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Arrow Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components pays out 65.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arrow Electronics quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Taitron Components quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Arrow Electronics's net income of $100.6M is higher than Taitron Components's net income of $245K. Notably, Arrow Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Taitron Components's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arrow Electronics is 0.22x versus 3.55x for Taitron Components. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.