LFUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet, Inc. has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Littelfuse, Inc.'s net margin of 0.88%. Littelfuse, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.17% beat Avnet, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.73%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $303.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.03%. On the other hand Avnet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that Littelfuse, Inc. has higher upside potential than Avnet, Inc., analysts believe Littelfuse, Inc. is more attractive than Avnet, Inc..

Littelfuse, Inc. has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet, Inc. has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.726%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Avnet, Inc. offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Littelfuse, Inc. pays 67.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet, Inc. pays out 48.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Littelfuse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $624.6M, which are smaller than Avnet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Littelfuse, Inc.'s net income of $69.5M is higher than Avnet, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M. Notably, Littelfuse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.47x while Avnet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse, Inc. is 2.79x versus 0.19x for Avnet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EACO Corp. has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Littelfuse, Inc.'s net margin of 7.45%. Littelfuse, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.17% beat EACO Corp.'s return on equity of 23.27%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $303.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.03%. On the other hand EACO Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Littelfuse, Inc. has higher upside potential than EACO Corp., analysts believe Littelfuse, Inc. is more attractive than EACO Corp..

Littelfuse, Inc. has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EACO Corp. has a beta of 0.072, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.758%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. EACO Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Littelfuse, Inc. pays 67.48% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Littelfuse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $624.6M, which are larger than EACO Corp. quarterly revenues of $122.5M. Littelfuse, Inc.'s net income of $69.5M is higher than EACO Corp.'s net income of $9.1M. Notably, Littelfuse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.47x while EACO Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse, Inc. is 2.79x versus 0.85x for EACO Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ParkerVision, Inc. has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Littelfuse, Inc.'s net margin of --. Littelfuse, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.17% beat ParkerVision, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $303.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.03%. On the other hand ParkerVision, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4467.2%. Given that ParkerVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Littelfuse, Inc., analysts believe ParkerVision, Inc. is more attractive than Littelfuse, Inc..

Littelfuse, Inc. has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParkerVision, Inc. has a beta of 2.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.898%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. ParkerVision, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Littelfuse, Inc. pays 67.48% of its earnings as a dividend. ParkerVision, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Littelfuse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $624.6M, which are larger than ParkerVision, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Littelfuse, Inc.'s net income of $69.5M is higher than ParkerVision, Inc.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Littelfuse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.47x while ParkerVision, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse, Inc. is 2.79x versus -- for ParkerVision, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics Ltd. has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Littelfuse, Inc.'s net margin of 3.5%. Littelfuse, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.17% beat Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.11%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $303.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.03%. On the other hand Richardson Electronics Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.37%. Given that Richardson Electronics Ltd. has higher upside potential than Littelfuse, Inc., analysts believe Richardson Electronics Ltd. is more attractive than Littelfuse, Inc..

Littelfuse, Inc. has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics Ltd. has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.396%.

Littelfuse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Richardson Electronics Ltd. offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Littelfuse, Inc. pays 67.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics Ltd. pays out 298.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s is not.

Littelfuse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $624.6M, which are larger than Richardson Electronics Ltd. quarterly revenues of $54.6M. Littelfuse, Inc.'s net income of $69.5M is higher than Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Littelfuse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.47x while Richardson Electronics Ltd.'s PE ratio is 486.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse, Inc. is 2.79x versus 0.69x for Richardson Electronics Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.