Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
36
MATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.95
Seasonality move
:
-2.51%
Day range:
$2.68 - $2.90
52-week range:
$0.88 - $4.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
8.95x
P/S ratio:
2.44x
P/B ratio:
3.05x
Volume:
59.6K
Avg. volume:
105.7K
1-year change:
223.78%
Market cap:
$113.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AFBI
Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FBP
First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)
|
$255.6M | $0.49 | -18.15% | 9.71% | $24.17 |
|
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNB
Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
$2.88 | -- | $113.8M | 8.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
AFBI
Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
|
$19.97 | -- | $123.2M | 17.20x | $1.50 | 0% | 2.51x |
|
FBP
First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)
|
$20.25 | $24.17 | $3.2B | 9.84x | $0.18 | 3.56% | 2.63x |
|
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)
|
$53.87 | -- | $241.3M | 15.38x | $0.33 | 2.43% | 1.89x |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
$43.99 | -- | $105M | 16.67x | $0.19 | 1.73% | 1.82x |
|
UNB
Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)
|
$23.39 | -- | $107.2M | 9.44x | $0.36 | 6.16% | 1.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
22.88% | 1.656 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
AFBI
Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
|
30.1% | 0.517 | 44.21% | 0.00x |
|
FBP
First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)
|
13.13% | 0.755 | 8.26% | 0.00x |
|
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)
|
56.36% | 0.279 | 104.28% | 0.00x |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
27.49% | -0.147 | 37.03% | 0.00x |
|
UNB
Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)
|
78.71% | -0.665 | 253.08% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
AFBI
Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
|
-- | $2.9M | 4.14% | 6% | 59.72% | $3.6M |
|
FBP
First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)
|
-- | $106.2M | 15.03% | 18.71% | 54.74% | $136.5M |
|
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)
|
-- | $6.7M | 4.08% | 10.18% | 52.6% | $9.1M |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | $2.1M | 4.6% | 6.52% | 50.25% | $3M |
|
UNB
Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)
|
-- | $3.9M | 3.29% | 15.84% | 52.76% | -$37.1M |
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or AFBI?
Affinity Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 16.41%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78% beat Affinity Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M AFBIAffinity Bancshares, Inc.-- $0.34 $179.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or AFBI?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Affinity Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Affinity Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Affinity Bancshares, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 AFBIAffinity Bancshares, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MATH or AFBI More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 197.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affinity Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.220, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or AFBI?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Affinity Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Affinity Bancshares, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or AFBI?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Affinity Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.5M. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Affinity Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Affinity Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is 2.44x versus 2.51x for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- -- AFBIAffinity Bancshares, Inc.2.51x 17.20x $13.5M $2.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or FBP?
First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 32.17%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78% beat First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)'s return on equity of 18.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M FBPFirst BanCorp (Puerto Rico)-- $0.63 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or FBP?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) has an analysts' consensus of $24.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.34%. Given that First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 FBPFirst BanCorp (Puerto Rico)4 1 0 -
Is MATH or FBP More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 197.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.863%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or FBP?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or FBP?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First BanCorp (Puerto Rico) quarterly revenues of $312.5M. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)'s net income of $100.5M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while First BanCorp (Puerto Rico)'s PE ratio is 9.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is 2.44x versus 2.63x for First BanCorp (Puerto Rico). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- -- FBPFirst BanCorp (Puerto Rico)2.63x 9.84x $312.5M $100.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or FRAF?
Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 15.53%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78% beat Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s return on equity of 10.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M FRAFFranklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)-- $1.19 $381.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or FRAF?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania), analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 FRAFFranklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)0 0 0 -
Is MATH or FRAF More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 197.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a beta of -0.101, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.091%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or FRAF?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) pays out 50.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or FRAF?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) quarterly revenues of $34.5M. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s net income of $5.4M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is 2.44x versus 1.89x for Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- -- FRAFFranklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)1.89x 15.38x $34.5M $5.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or SFBC?
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 10.92%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78% beat Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.-- $0.66 $148.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or SFBC?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MATH or SFBC More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 197.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.837%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or SFBC?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. pays out 42.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or SFBC?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is 2.44x versus 1.82x for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- -- SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.1.82x 16.67x $15.5M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or UNB?
Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 15.23%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78% beat Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s return on equity of 15.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M UNBUnion Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)-- $0.75 $364.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or UNB?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont), analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 UNBUnion Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)0 0 0 -
Is MATH or UNB More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 197.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or UNB?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) offers a yield of 6.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) pays out 74.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or UNB?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s net income of $3.4M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s PE ratio is 9.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. is 2.44x versus 1.25x for Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- -- UNBUnion Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)1.25x 9.44x $22.6M $3.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
