Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Buy
61
MATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.24
Seasonality move
:
-3.07%
Day range:
$2.10 - $2.33
52-week range:
$0.80 - $2.78
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
11.24x
P/S ratio:
2.56x
P/B ratio:
3.21x
Volume:
76.9K
Avg. volume:
76.5K
1-year change:
47.22%
Market cap:
$81.4M
Revenue:
$16.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$587.3M | $1.71 | 35.27% | 67.95% | $140.33 |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$2.12 | -- | $81.4M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.56x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
$2.33 | -- | $5.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.82x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$103.53 | $140.33 | $14.4B | 20.77x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.32x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.81 | -- | $7.4M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 5.59x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.17 | -- | $43.3M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.26x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.60 | -- | $67.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -2.488 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | 1.801 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
22.81% | 1.152 | 9.66% | 0.67x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 1.248 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.507 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 4.940 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$470.3M | $285.2M | 16.9% | 20.37% | 50.03% | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Metalpha Technology Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or ABTS?
Abits Group has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M ABTSAbits Group-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abits Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Abits Group, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than Abits Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 ABTSAbits Group0 0 0 -
Is MATH or ABTS More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 224.417% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group has a beta of 3.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.772%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abits Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Abits Group's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Abits Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 2.56x versus 0.82x for Abits Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.56x 11.24x -- -- ABTSAbits Group0.82x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of 42.23%. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M FUTUFutu Holdings82.49% $1.72 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $140.33 which suggests that it could grow by 35.54%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is MATH or FUTU More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 224.417% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.772%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 2.56x versus 8.32x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.56x 11.24x -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings8.32x 20.77x $570.1M $240.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is MATH or MEGL More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 224.417% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 2.56x versus 5.59x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.56x 11.24x -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global5.59x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is MATH or TOP More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 224.417% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 2.56x versus 14.26x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.56x 11.24x -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group14.26x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or TROO?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is MATH or TROO More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, which suggesting that the stock is 224.417% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.036%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or TROO?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or TROO?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 2.56x versus 6.09x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.56x 11.24x -- -- TROOTROOPS6.09x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
From time to time, investors will run across the term…
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
99
DAVE alert for May 9
Dave [DAVE] is up 9.31% over the past day.
Buy
52
QDEL alert for May 9
QuidelOrtho [QDEL] is down 0.22% over the past day.
Buy
61
TPC alert for May 9
Tutor Perini [TPC] is up 9.61% over the past day.
