MANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commvault Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 21.26% compared to Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity of 76.59% beat Commvault Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.55, signalling upside risk potential of 26.16%. On the other hand Commvault Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $174.58 which suggests that it could grow by 40.96%. Given that Commvault Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, Inc., analysts believe Commvault Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Manhattan Associates, Inc..

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commvault Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.184%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commvault Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commvault Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. quarterly revenues are $275.8M, which are smaller than Commvault Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $276.2M. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net income of $58.6M is higher than Commvault Systems, Inc.'s net income of $14.7M. Notably, Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Commvault Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 69.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates, Inc. is 10.01x versus 5.11x for Commvault Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog, Inc. has a net margin of 21.26% compared to Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net margin of 3.83%. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity of 76.59% beat Datadog, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.58%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.55, signalling upside risk potential of 26.16%. On the other hand Datadog, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $198.37 which suggests that it could grow by 52.44%. Given that Datadog, Inc. has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, Inc., analysts believe Datadog, Inc. is more attractive than Manhattan Associates, Inc..

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog, Inc. has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.299%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. quarterly revenues are $275.8M, which are smaller than Datadog, Inc. quarterly revenues of $885.7M. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net income of $58.6M is higher than Datadog, Inc.'s net income of $33.9M. Notably, Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Datadog, Inc.'s PE ratio is 440.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates, Inc. is 10.01x versus 14.63x for Datadog, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JFrog Ltd. has a net margin of 21.26% compared to Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net margin of -12%. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity of 76.59% beat JFrog Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.94%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.55, signalling upside risk potential of 26.16%. On the other hand JFrog Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.22%. Given that Manhattan Associates, Inc. has higher upside potential than JFrog Ltd., analysts believe Manhattan Associates, Inc. is more attractive than JFrog Ltd..

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JFrog Ltd. has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.152%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JFrog Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JFrog Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. quarterly revenues are $275.8M, which are larger than JFrog Ltd. quarterly revenues of $136.9M. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net income of $58.6M is higher than JFrog Ltd.'s net income of -$16.4M. Notably, Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while JFrog Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates, Inc. is 10.01x versus 13.31x for JFrog Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 21.26% compared to Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net margin of 35.72%. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity of 76.59% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.55, signalling upside risk potential of 26.16%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $617.86 which suggests that it could grow by 32.6%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Manhattan Associates, Inc..

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.537%.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Manhattan Associates, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. quarterly revenues are $275.8M, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net income of $58.6M is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.43x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates, Inc. is 10.01x versus 11.84x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.