FROG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bandwidth has a net margin of -19.99% compared to JFrog's net margin of -0.84%. JFrog's return on equity of -9.52% beat Bandwidth's return on equity of -2.1%.

JFrog has a consensus price target of $44.93, signalling upside risk potential of 44.9%. On the other hand Bandwidth has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 81.07%. Given that Bandwidth has higher upside potential than JFrog, analysts believe Bandwidth is more attractive than JFrog.

JFrog has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bandwidth has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.876%.

JFrog has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bandwidth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JFrog pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bandwidth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JFrog quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Bandwidth quarterly revenues of $210M. JFrog's net income of -$23.2M is lower than Bandwidth's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, JFrog's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bandwidth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JFrog is 7.94x versus 0.46x for Bandwidth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -19.99% compared to JFrog's net margin of 0.54%. JFrog's return on equity of -9.52% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

JFrog has a consensus price target of $44.93, signalling upside risk potential of 44.9%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 281.47%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than JFrog, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than JFrog.

JFrog has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

JFrog has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JFrog pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JFrog quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. JFrog's net income of -$23.2M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, JFrog's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JFrog is 7.94x versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -19.99% compared to JFrog's net margin of -2.79%. JFrog's return on equity of -9.52% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

JFrog has a consensus price target of $44.93, signalling upside risk potential of 44.9%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $140.22 which suggests that it could grow by 31.97%. Given that JFrog has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe JFrog is more attractive than Cloudflare.

JFrog has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

JFrog has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JFrog pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JFrog quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. JFrog's net income of -$23.2M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, JFrog's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JFrog is 7.94x versus 21.73x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procore Technologies has a net margin of -19.99% compared to JFrog's net margin of -20.62%. JFrog's return on equity of -9.52% beat Procore Technologies's return on equity of -8.57%.

JFrog has a consensus price target of $44.93, signalling upside risk potential of 44.9%. On the other hand Procore Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $89.01 which suggests that it could grow by 46.87%. Given that Procore Technologies has higher upside potential than JFrog, analysts believe Procore Technologies is more attractive than JFrog.

JFrog has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procore Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JFrog has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Procore Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JFrog pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Procore Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JFrog quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Procore Technologies quarterly revenues of $302M. JFrog's net income of -$23.2M is higher than Procore Technologies's net income of -$62.3M. Notably, JFrog's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Procore Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JFrog is 7.94x versus 7.76x for Procore Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.