BLKB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CommVault Systems has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 4.2%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 65.85%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.02%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $179.79 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.355%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $262.6M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than CommVault Systems's net income of $11M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 41.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.76x versus 7.55x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 9.94%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 19.09%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.02%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $239.74 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Paylocity Holding has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Paylocity Holding is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.469%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $377M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $37.5M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 51.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.76x versus 7.34x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith Micro Software has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of -88.35%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Smith Micro Software's return on equity of -100.51%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.02%. On the other hand Smith Micro Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 559.39%. Given that Smith Micro Software has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Smith Micro Software is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith Micro Software has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.792%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith Micro Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith Micro Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than Smith Micro Software quarterly revenues of $5M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Smith Micro Software's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Smith Micro Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.76x versus 0.44x for Smith Micro Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZoomInfo Technologies has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 4.72%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat ZoomInfo Technologies's return on equity of 1.56%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $78.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.02%. On the other hand ZoomInfo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.90 which suggests that it could grow by 19%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than ZoomInfo Technologies, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than ZoomInfo Technologies.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZoomInfo Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZoomInfo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZoomInfo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are smaller than ZoomInfo Technologies quarterly revenues of $309.1M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than ZoomInfo Technologies's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while ZoomInfo Technologies's PE ratio is 125.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.76x versus 2.98x for ZoomInfo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.