BLKB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 19.59%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $319.72 which suggests that it could grow by 3.57%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.723% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.746%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.78x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 81.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.56x versus 19.38x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 6.67%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.55%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.723% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.294%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are larger than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $233.3M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is higher than CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.78x while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 39.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.56x versus 7.91x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of -9.14%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.723% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.78x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.56x versus 0.77x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of -6.7%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 8.12% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.89%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.723% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $286.7M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Blackbaud's net income of $20.5M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.78x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 3.56x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.