CVLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of 19.59%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $319.72 which suggests that it could grow by 4.82%. Given that CommVault Systems has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe CommVault Systems is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.746%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 80.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.71x versus 19.15x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of -9.14%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.71x versus 0.77x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of -6.7%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.89%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.71x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of 6.67% compared to CommVault Systems's net margin of -293.07%. CommVault Systems's return on equity of 74.28% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

CommVault Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.31%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of $518.68 which suggests that it could grow by 52.08%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

CommVault Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommVault Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommVault Systems quarterly revenues are $233.3M, which are larger than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. CommVault Systems's net income of $15.6M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, CommVault Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommVault Systems is 7.71x versus 141.44x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.