CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oracle Corp. has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 38.49%. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.9% beat Oracle Corp.'s return on equity of 72.55%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $379.59, signalling upside risk potential of 28.67%. On the other hand Oracle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $288.26 which suggests that it could grow by 76.86%. Given that Oracle Corp. has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, Inc., analysts believe Oracle Corp. is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems, Inc..

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle Corp. has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.132%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle Corp. offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp. pays out 39.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Oracle Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.1B. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net income of $287.1M is lower than Oracle Corp.'s net income of $6.2B. Notably, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.47x while Oracle Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is 15.56x versus 7.81x for Oracle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys, Inc. has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 19.9%. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.9% beat Synopsys, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.94%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $379.59, signalling upside risk potential of 28.67%. On the other hand Synopsys, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $555.65 which suggests that it could grow by 19.47%. Given that Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Synopsys, Inc., analysts believe Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Synopsys, Inc..

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys, Inc. has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Synopsys, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net income of $287.1M is lower than Synopsys, Inc.'s net income of $448.5M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.47x while Synopsys, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is 15.56x versus 10.91x for Synopsys, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Atlassian Corp. has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -3.62%. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.9% beat Atlassian Corp.'s return on equity of -14.57%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $379.59, signalling upside risk potential of 28.67%. On the other hand Atlassian Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $229.58 which suggests that it could grow by 95.53%. Given that Atlassian Corp. has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, Inc., analysts believe Atlassian Corp. is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems, Inc..

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlassian Corp. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.176%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlassian Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atlassian Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Atlassian Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net income of $287.1M is higher than Atlassian Corp.'s net income of -$51.9M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.47x while Atlassian Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is 15.56x versus 5.68x for Atlassian Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday, Inc. has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 10.38%. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.9% beat Workday, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.19%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $379.59, signalling upside risk potential of 28.67%. On the other hand Workday, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $271.06 which suggests that it could grow by 54.92%. Given that Workday, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, Inc., analysts believe Workday, Inc. is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems, Inc..

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday, Inc. has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.487%.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Workday, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s net income of $287.1M is higher than Workday, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.47x while Workday, Inc.'s PE ratio is 73.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is 15.56x versus 5.15x for Workday, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.