LRHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 0.12%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.34%. Given that Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.225%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays out 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.9M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.04x versus 1.51x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 6.45%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.726%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $906.8M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.04x versus 1.30x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -0.05%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.81%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.482%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.04x versus 0.46x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital Corp. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 8.31%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Sachem Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -17.3%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sachem Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 41.27%. Given that Sachem Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Sachem Capital Corp. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.935%.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital Corp. offers a yield of 19.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp. pays out 52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are larger than Sachem Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $12M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Sachem Capital Corp.'s net income of $997K. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.04x versus 2.14x for Sachem Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.