Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
16
LRHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.54
Seasonality move
:
-21.12%
Day range:
$0.51 - $0.58
52-week range:
$0.51 - $186.56
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.00x
P/B ratio:
0.18x
Volume:
131.3K
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
-99.62%
Market cap:
$280.5K
Revenue:
$69.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$478.98
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
|
$6B | $2.95 | 3.95% | 157.94% | $378.70 |
|
KANP
Kaanapali Land LLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
|
$165M | -$0.06 | 13.76% | -47.18% | $28.00 |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
|
$742.1M | $0.27 | 14.53% | 153.42% | $19.50 |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage, Inc.
|
$476.5M | -- | 34.86% | -- | $5.40 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
|
$0.56 | -- | $280.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
|
$306.05 | $378.70 | $14.3B | 18.66x | $0.00 | 0.28% | 0.57x |
|
KANP
Kaanapali Land LLC
|
$26.50 | -- | $47.5M | 94.87x | $0.00 | 0% | 29.72x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
|
$26.30 | $28.00 | $1B | -- | $0.25 | 1.89% | 1.37x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
|
$14.63 | $19.50 | $2.7B | 21.02x | $0.03 | 0.84% | 1.01x |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage, Inc.
|
$2.53 | $5.40 | $521.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.27x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
|
87.2% | 5.934 | 112.99% | 1.23x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
|
25.66% | 1.104 | 16.27% | 0.13x |
|
KANP
Kaanapali Land LLC
|
-- | 0.156 | -- | 20.09x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
|
11.49% | 0.110 | 7.56% | 2.13x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
|
58.82% | 1.193 | 61.09% | 0.18x |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage, Inc.
|
-- | 0.311 | -- | 1.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
|
$1.5M | -$5M | -157.94% | -188.78% | -24.68% | -$1.3M |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
|
$7.6B | $529.5M | 7.51% | 11.02% | 6.96% | $819.9M |
|
KANP
Kaanapali Land LLC
|
-$990K | -$2M | -4.7% | -4.7% | -550.55% | -$2.2M |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
|
$86.1M | $15.7M | -0.28% | -0.31% | 6.42% | $43.9M |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
|
-- | $123.6M | 3.93% | 9.71% | 12.14% | $608.8M |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage, Inc.
|
$38.4M | -$4.5M | -18.43% | -18.43% | -0.89% | -$839.1K |
La Rosa Holdings Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or JLL?
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 5.28%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.7.62% -$5.44 $16.3M JLLJones Lang LaSalle, Inc.99.27% $8.34 $10.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $378.70 which suggests that it could grow by 23.74%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0 0 0 JLLJones Lang LaSalle, Inc.6 4 0 -
Is LRHC or JLL More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.187%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $401.8M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.00x versus 0.57x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0.00x -- $20.2M -$5.5M JLLJones Lang LaSalle, Inc.0.57x 18.66x $7.6B $401.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or KANP?
Kaanapali Land LLC has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -464.64%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Kaanapali Land LLC's return on equity of -4.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.7.62% -$5.44 $16.3M KANPKaanapali Land LLC-273.48% -$0.91 $77.1M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or KANP?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaanapali Land LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that La Rosa Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Kaanapali Land LLC, analysts believe La Rosa Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Kaanapali Land LLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0 0 0 KANPKaanapali Land LLC0 0 0 -
Is LRHC or KANP More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaanapali Land LLC has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.947%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or KANP?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaanapali Land LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaanapali Land LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or KANP?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are larger than Kaanapali Land LLC quarterly revenues of $362K. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Kaanapali Land LLC's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaanapali Land LLC's PE ratio is 94.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.00x versus 29.72x for Kaanapali Land LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0.00x -- $20.2M -$5.5M KANPKaanapali Land LLC29.72x 94.87x $362K -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or MMI?
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 5.46%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.7.62% -$5.44 $16.3M MMIMarcus & Millichap, Inc.35.28% $0.34 $681.4M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.46%. Given that Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0 0 0 MMIMarcus & Millichap, Inc.0 1 1 -
Is LRHC or MMI More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.239%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays out 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.00x versus 1.37x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0.00x -- $20.2M -$5.5M MMIMarcus & Millichap, Inc.1.37x -- $244M $13.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or NMRK?
Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 8.2%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.7.62% -$5.44 $16.3M NMRKNewmark Group, Inc.-- $0.37 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.29%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0 0 0 NMRKNewmark Group, Inc.2 1 0 -
Is LRHC or NMRK More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.837, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.712%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $83.4M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.00x versus 1.01x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0.00x -- $20.2M -$5.5M NMRKNewmark Group, Inc.1.01x 21.02x $1B $83.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or REAX?
The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of -27.43% compared to La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -0.83%. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.7.62% -$5.44 $16.3M REAXThe Real Brokerage, Inc.7.61% -$0.02 $51.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.40 which suggests that it could grow by 113.6%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0 0 0 REAXThe Real Brokerage, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is LRHC or REAX More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.688%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $505.1M. La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M is lower than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$4.2M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings Corp. is 0.00x versus 0.27x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings Corp.0.00x -- $20.2M -$5.5M REAXThe Real Brokerage, Inc.0.27x -- $505.1M -$4.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
