NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
44
LRHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.78
Seasonality move
:
-11.62%
Day range:
$0.66 - $0.84
52-week range:
$0.47 - $5.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.19x
P/B ratio:
3.29x
Volume:
645.8K
Avg. volume:
205.6K
1-year change:
-49.23%
Market cap:
$16.3M
Revenue:
$31.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COMP
Compass
|
$1.5B | $0.03 | 17.59% | -82.35% | $7.41 |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
$5.6B | $2.74 | 11.4% | 63.24% | $311.67 |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$160.9M | -$0.19 | 12.97% | -77.78% | $30.00 |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
$681.6M | $0.30 | 5% | 119.05% | -- |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
$14.8M | $0.06 | 103.21% | -810% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
$0.81 | -- | $16.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
|
COMP
Compass
|
$6.23 | $7.41 | $3.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
$252.74 | $311.67 | $12B | 25.56x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.54x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$37.99 | $30.00 | $1.5B | -- | $0.25 | 1.32% | 2.36x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
$13.02 | -- | $2.2B | 43.40x | $0.03 | 0.92% | 1.07x |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
$1.21 | -- | $56.8M | 37.50x | $0.05 | 28.93% | 1.94x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
36.22% | -0.786 | 16.12% | 0.42x |
|
COMP
Compass
|
6.04% | 3.368 | 0.89% | 0.81x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
37.96% | 1.478 | 31.45% | 0.97x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
-- | 1.319 | 0.69% | 3.02x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
60% | 2.127 | 60.13% | 0.39x |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
57.38% | 1.381 | 250.68% | 0.32x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
$1.6M | -$1.7M | -157.94% | -188.78% | -11.02% | -$596.6K |
|
COMP
Compass
|
$266.3M | -$1.7M | -44.77% | -47.6% | -0.08% | $32.8M |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
-- | $219.5M | 5.13% | 7.41% | 3.74% | $216.7M |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$63.8M | -$11.5M | -4.92% | -4.92% | -3.65% | $13.2M |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
-- | $40.7M | 1.83% | 3.43% | 5.99% | -$95.9M |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
-- | -- | -0.81% | -1.97% | 28.54% | $2.4M |
La Rosa Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or COMP?
Compass has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -0.11%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Compass's return on equity of -47.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M COMPCompass17.83% -$0.00 $458.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or COMP?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compass has an analysts' consensus of $7.41 which suggests that it could grow by 18.88%. Given that Compass has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Compass is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 COMPCompass1 5 0 -
Is LRHC or COMP More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or COMP?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compass offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compass pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or COMP?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Compass quarterly revenues of $1.5B. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Compass's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compass's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.58x for Compass. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.19x -- $19.6M -$2.5M COMPCompass0.58x -- $1.5B -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or JLL?
Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of 2.64%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M JLLJones Lang LaSalle-- $3.20 $10.8B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $311.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.32%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 JLLJones Lang LaSalle4 2 0 -
Is LRHC or JLL More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.278%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $5.9B. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $155.1M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 25.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.54x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.19x -- $19.6M -$2.5M JLLJones Lang LaSalle0.54x 25.56x $5.9B $155.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or MMI?
Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -3.2%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M MMIMarcus & Millichap37.84% -$0.14 $617.7M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -21.03%. Given that Marcus & Millichap has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Marcus & Millichap is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 MMIMarcus & Millichap0 0 1 -
Is LRHC or MMI More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.093%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $168.5M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.19x versus 2.36x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.19x -- $19.6M -$2.5M MMIMarcus & Millichap2.36x -- $168.5M -$5.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or NMRK?
Newmark Group has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of 2.59%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M NMRKNewmark Group-- $0.10 $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.37%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 NMRKNewmark Group0 3 0 -
Is LRHC or NMRK More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.717%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $685.9M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 43.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.19x versus 1.07x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.19x -- $19.6M -$2.5M NMRKNewmark Group1.07x 43.40x $685.9M $17.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or SACH?
Sachem Capital has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -80.75%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M SACHSachem Capital-- -$0.13 $517.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.84%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 SACHSachem Capital0 0 0 -
Is LRHC or SACH More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 28.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 37.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.19x versus 1.94x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.19x -- $19.6M -$2.5M SACHSachem Capital1.94x 37.50x $6.3M -$5.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 6.3% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 9.53% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.83% over the past day.
