Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Sell
14
LRHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.14
Seasonality move
:
-33.13%
Day range:
$0.14 - $0.14
52-week range:
$0.09 - $3.36
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.03x
P/B ratio:
2.06x
Volume:
762K
Avg. volume:
14.6M
1-year change:
-90.46%
Market cap:
$5.3M
Revenue:
$69.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
$5.5B | $2.18 | 10.89% | 81.5% | $292.33 |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$140.2M | -$0.16 | 8.99% | -71.43% | $30.00 |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
$606.1M | $0.19 | 9.14% | 225% | $14.92 |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage
|
$332.9M | -- | 36.14% | -- | $6.50 |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
$11.7M | -- | 55.82% | -100% | $1.88 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
$0.14 | -- | $5.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
$229.63 | $292.33 | $10.9B | 20.76x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$29.81 | $30.00 | $1.2B | -- | $0.25 | 1.68% | 1.62x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
$11.22 | $14.92 | $2.1B | 28.77x | $0.03 | 1.07% | 0.84x |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage
|
$4.14 | $6.50 | $848M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
$0.98 | $1.88 | $46.2M | 40.83x | $0.05 | 29.7% | 17.85x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
36.22% | 0.103 | 16.12% | 0.42x |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
28.82% | 1.805 | 23.26% | 1.00x |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
-- | 1.460 | 0.8% | 3.52x |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
54.65% | 2.340 | 64.84% | 0.41x |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage
|
-- | 1.950 | -- | 0.87x |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
59.56% | -1.414 | 481.19% | 0.46x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LRHC
La Rosa Holdings
|
$1.6M | -$1.7M | -157.94% | -188.78% | -11.02% | -$596.6K |
|
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle
|
-- | $139.7M | 5.61% | 7.99% | 2.43% | -$812.1M |
|
MMI
Marcus & Millichap
|
$56.7M | -$17.7M | -1.09% | -1.09% | -9.47% | -$54.3M |
|
NMRK
Newmark Group
|
-- | -$18.3M | 2.28% | 4.51% | -2.63% | -$184.8M |
|
REAX
The Real Brokerage
|
$30M | -$6.8M | -85.25% | -85.25% | -1.84% | $4M |
|
SACH
Sachem Capital
|
-- | -- | -8.53% | -20.65% | 224.87% | $150K |
La Rosa Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or JLL?
Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of 0.96%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M JLLJones Lang LaSalle-- $1.14 $9.7B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $292.33 which suggests that it could grow by 27.31%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 JLLJones Lang LaSalle4 2 0 -
Is LRHC or JLL More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.771%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or JLL?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $5.7B. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $55.3M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 20.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.46x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.03x -- $19.6M -$2.5M JLLJones Lang LaSalle0.46x 20.76x $5.7B $55.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or MMI?
Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -3.05%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M MMIMarcus & Millichap39.09% -$0.11 $617.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.64%. Given that Marcus & Millichap has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Marcus & Millichap is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 MMIMarcus & Millichap0 0 1 -
Is LRHC or MMI More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.453%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or MMI?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $145M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.03x versus 1.62x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.03x -- $19.6M -$2.5M MMIMarcus & Millichap1.62x -- $145M -$4.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or NMRK?
Newmark Group has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -1.32%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M NMRKNewmark Group-- -$0.05 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 32.95%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 NMRKNewmark Group0 2 0 -
Is LRHC or NMRK More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.986, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.584%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or NMRK?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $665.5M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.84x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.03x -- $19.6M -$2.5M NMRKNewmark Group0.84x 28.77x $665.5M -$8.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or REAX?
The Real Brokerage has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of -1.9%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -85.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M REAXThe Real Brokerage8.55% -$0.03 $32.1M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Real Brokerage has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.01%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 REAXThe Real Brokerage3 0 0 -
Is LRHC or REAX More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Real Brokerage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or REAX?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues of $350.6M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is higher than The Real Brokerage's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.63x for The Real Brokerage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.03x -- $19.6M -$2.5M REAXThe Real Brokerage0.63x -- $350.6M -$6.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns LRHC or SACH?
Sachem Capital has a net margin of -12.52% compared to La Rosa Holdings's net margin of 29.05%. La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LRHCLa Rosa Holdings8.35% -$0.21 $13.2M SACHSachem Capital-- -- $443.4M -
What do Analysts Say About LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 92.01%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0 0 0 SACHSachem Capital1 4 0 -
Is LRHC or SACH More Risky?
La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 29.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. La Rosa Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LRHC or SACH?
La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.6M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $3.1M. La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Sachem Capital's net income of $904K. Notably, La Rosa Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La Rosa Holdings is 0.03x versus 17.85x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LRHCLa Rosa Holdings0.03x -- $19.6M -$2.5M SACHSachem Capital17.85x 40.83x $3.1M $904K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 25.68% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 7.5% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 5.2% over the past day.
