Financhill
Sell
35

CLMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$19.83
Seasonality move :
2.79%
Day range:
$20.20 - $21.02
52-week range:
$9.97 - $25.29
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.39x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.1M
Avg. volume:
731.4K
1-year change:
23.8%
Market cap:
$1.8B
Revenue:
$4.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$2.76

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLMT
Calumet
$972.1M -$0.86 -4.85% -38.98% $24.60
CRGY
Crescent Energy
$778.1M $0.29 35.22% -50.36% $17.70
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$22M $0.04 8.1% -33.33% --
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$2.4B $3.92 58.78% -34.36% $215.17
VTLE
Vital Energy
$456.3M $1.54 20.47% -78.29% $39.58
WTI
W&T Offshore
$122.6M -$0.23 1.09% -6518.13% --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLMT
Calumet
$20.39 $24.60 $1.8B -- $0.00 0% 0.39x
CRGY
Crescent Energy
$13.68 $17.70 $2.2B 16.68x $0.12 3.51% 0.95x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$4.95 -- $166.3M 35.36x $0.12 9.7% 1.87x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$154.94 $215.17 $45.2B 8.87x $0.90 5.35% 2.99x
VTLE
Vital Energy
$28.39 $39.58 $1.1B 1.99x $0.00 0% 0.54x
WTI
W&T Offshore
$1.44 -- $212.2M -- $0.01 2.78% 0.39x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLMT
Calumet
148.46% -0.388 115.92% 0.27x
CRGY
Crescent Energy
53% 2.124 103.58% 0.69x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
33.16% 1.754 22.13% 1.43x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
25.67% 0.572 24.92% 0.40x
VTLE
Vital Energy
44.33% 1.068 236.99% 0.39x
WTI
W&T Offshore
108.73% 0.508 123.92% 0.86x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLMT
Calumet
$4.9M -$57.1M -11.01% -- -3.84% -$32.2M
CRGY
Crescent Energy
$615.3M $45.7M 1% 1.6% 7.33% -$179.3M
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$4.4M $1.9M 4.3% 5.54% 16.94% $4.6M
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.1B $968M 10.46% 14.68% 35.39% -$7.3B
VTLE
Vital Energy
$123.3M $87.1M 10.17% 17.64% 68.75% -$803.4M
WTI
W&T Offshore
$81M -$19M -15.91% -579.3% -25.93% $5.1M

Calumet vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLMT or CRGY?

    Crescent Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of -1.34%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.45% -$1.18 $1.6B
    CRGY
    Crescent Energy
    82.61% -$0.07 $7.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLMT or CRGY?

    Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Crescent Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLMT
    Calumet
    2 2 0
    CRGY
    Crescent Energy
    8 2 0
  • Is CLMT or CRGY More Risky?

    Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLMT or CRGY?

    Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Energy offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLMT or CRGY?

    Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Crescent Energy quarterly revenues of $744.9M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crescent Energy's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.39x versus 0.95x for Crescent Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.39x -- $1.1B -$100.6M
    CRGY
    Crescent Energy
    0.95x 16.68x $744.9M -$9.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLMT or EPM?

    Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 9.43%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.45% -$1.18 $1.6B
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    20.01% $0.06 $119.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLMT or EPM?

    Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Calumet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLMT
    Calumet
    2 2 0
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    0 0 0
  • Is CLMT or EPM More Risky?

    Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLMT or EPM?

    Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLMT or EPM?

    Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 35.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.39x versus 1.87x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.39x -- $1.1B -$100.6M
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    1.87x 35.36x $21.9M $2.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLMT or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 24.92%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.45% -$1.18 $1.6B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    40% $3.19 $51.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLMT or FANG?

    Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 38.88%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLMT
    Calumet
    2 2 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    13 5 0
  • Is CLMT or FANG More Risky?

    Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLMT or FANG?

    Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLMT or FANG?

    Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.39x versus 2.99x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.39x -- $1.1B -$100.6M
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.99x 8.87x $2.6B $659M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLMT or VTLE?

    Vital Energy has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of 46.88%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.45% -$1.18 $1.6B
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    26.85% $5.73 $5.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLMT or VTLE?

    Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 39.43%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Calumet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLMT
    Calumet
    2 2 0
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    4 5 1
  • Is CLMT or VTLE More Risky?

    Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 3.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 219.055%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLMT or VTLE?

    Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLMT or VTLE?

    Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $459.2M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 1.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.39x versus 0.54x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.39x -- $1.1B -$100.6M
    VTLE
    Vital Energy
    0.54x 1.99x $459.2M $215.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLMT or WTI?

    W&T Offshore has a net margin of -9.14% compared to Calumet's net margin of -30.42%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.45% -$1.18 $1.6B
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    66.75% -$0.25 $361.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLMT or WTI?

    Calumet has a consensus price target of $24.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.65%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 594.44%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Calumet.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLMT
    Calumet
    2 2 0
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0 0 0
  • Is CLMT or WTI More Risky?

    Calumet has a beta of 1.906, which suggesting that the stock is 90.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.897%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLMT or WTI?

    Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLMT or WTI?

    Calumet quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Calumet's net income of -$100.6M is lower than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.39x versus 0.39x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLMT
    Calumet
    0.39x -- $1.1B -$100.6M
    WTI
    W&T Offshore
    0.39x -- $121.4M -$36.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23

Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.65% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23

Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 4.9% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.4% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock