Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Sell
19
CCTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.18
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$0.18 - $0.19
52-week range:
$0.12 - $2.61
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.92x
P/B ratio:
1.16x
Volume:
172.2K
Avg. volume:
3.2M
1-year change:
-87.97%
Market cap:
$2.1M
Revenue:
$2.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.21
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCTG
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCTG
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.18 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.92x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.38 | -- | $9.4M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.60x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.25 | -- | $9.5M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.25 | -- | $5.8M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 0.91x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.42 | -- | $8.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.48x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$2.15 | -- | $128.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.70x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCTG
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 0.866 | -- | 1.82x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCTG
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -21.12% | -21.12% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CCTG or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -21.12% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.8M CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CCTG or CIIT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CCTG or CIIT More Risky?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCTG or CIIT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCTG or CIIT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 0.60x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0.92x -- -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.60x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CCTG or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -21.12% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.8M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CCTG or CLWT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCTG or CLWT More Risky?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCTG or CLWT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCTG or CLWT?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 0.61x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0.92x -- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.61x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCTG or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -21.12% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.8M HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CCTG or HIHO?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCTG or HIHO More Risky?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCTG or HIHO?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCTG or HIHO?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 0.91x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0.92x -- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0.91x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
-
Which has Higher Returns CCTG or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -21.12% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.8M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CCTG or ILAG?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CCTG or ILAG More Risky?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCTG or ILAG?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCTG or ILAG?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 1.48x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0.92x -- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.48x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCTG or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -21.12% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.8M ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CCTG or ROMA?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCTG or ROMA More Risky?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCTG or ROMA?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCTG or ROMA?
CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd. is 0.92x versus 18.70x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCTGCCSC Technology International Holdings Ltd.0.92x -- -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.18.70x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Buy
60
ZBIO alert for Dec 24
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
Buy
54
UNF alert for Dec 24
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.
