BSRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a net margin of 25.46% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 23.92%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 11.83% beat First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.26%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $39.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.56%. On the other hand First Hawaiian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.72 which suggests that it could grow by 5.05%. Given that First Hawaiian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sierra Bancorp, analysts believe First Hawaiian, Inc. is more attractive than Sierra Bancorp.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.866%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. First Hawaiian, Inc. offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $292.4M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $12.9M is lower than First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $69.9M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while First Hawaiian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 2.53x versus 2.83x for First Hawaiian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hancock Whitney Corp. has a net margin of 25.46% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 24.41%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 11.83% beat Hancock Whitney Corp.'s return on equity of 11.16%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $39.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.56%. On the other hand Hancock Whitney Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $77.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Hancock Whitney Corp. has higher upside potential than Sierra Bancorp, analysts believe Hancock Whitney Corp. is more attractive than Sierra Bancorp.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hancock Whitney Corp. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.549%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Hancock Whitney Corp. offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hancock Whitney Corp. pays out 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Hancock Whitney Corp. quarterly revenues of $514.4M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $12.9M is lower than Hancock Whitney Corp.'s net income of $125.6M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Hancock Whitney Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 2.53x versus 3.03x for Hancock Whitney Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Preferred Bank (California) has a net margin of 25.46% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 26.94%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 11.83% beat Preferred Bank (California)'s return on equity of 17.33%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $39.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.56%. On the other hand Preferred Bank (California) has an analysts' consensus of $102.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that Preferred Bank (California) has higher upside potential than Sierra Bancorp, analysts believe Preferred Bank (California) is more attractive than Sierra Bancorp.

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preferred Bank (California) has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.737%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Preferred Bank (California) offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Preferred Bank (California) pays out 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Preferred Bank (California) quarterly revenues of $129.3M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $12.9M is lower than Preferred Bank (California)'s net income of $34.8M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Preferred Bank (California)'s PE ratio is 8.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 2.53x versus 2.36x for Preferred Bank (California). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial Corp. has a net margin of 25.46% compared to Sierra Bancorp's net margin of 19.46%. Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 11.83% beat Tompkins Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 20.42%.

Sierra Bancorp has a consensus price target of $39.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.56%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $84.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.81%. Given that Sierra Bancorp has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial Corp., analysts believe Sierra Bancorp is more attractive than Tompkins Financial Corp..

Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.795, which suggesting that the stock is 20.469% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.825%.

Sierra Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Tompkins Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Sierra Bancorp pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial Corp. pays out 22.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $38.4M. Sierra Bancorp's net income of $12.9M is lower than Tompkins Financial Corp.'s net income of $96.2M. Notably, Sierra Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Tompkins Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sierra Bancorp is 2.53x versus 3.03x for Tompkins Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.