FHB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sierra Bancorp has a net margin of 23.92% compared to First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net margin of 25.46%. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Sierra Bancorp's return on equity of 11.83%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.09%. On the other hand Sierra Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could fall by -5.29%. Given that First Hawaiian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sierra Bancorp, analysts believe First Hawaiian, Inc. is more attractive than Sierra Bancorp.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.866% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sierra Bancorp has a beta of 0.795, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.469%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Sierra Bancorp offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sierra Bancorp pays out 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $292.4M, which are larger than Sierra Bancorp quarterly revenues of $50.6M. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $69.9M is higher than Sierra Bancorp's net income of $12.9M. Notably, First Hawaiian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Sierra Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian, Inc. is 2.83x versus 2.50x for Sierra Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a net margin of 23.92% compared to First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net margin of 22.68%. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.09%. On the other hand Columbia Banking System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.35 which suggests that it could grow by 8.95%. Given that Columbia Banking System, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, Inc., analysts believe Columbia Banking System, Inc. is more attractive than First Hawaiian, Inc..

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.866% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.588%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Columbia Banking System, Inc. offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Banking System, Inc. pays out 63.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $292.4M, which are smaller than Columbia Banking System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $948M. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $69.9M is lower than Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s net income of $215M. Notably, First Hawaiian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian, Inc. is 2.83x versus 2.21x for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has a net margin of 23.92% compared to First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net margin of 22.31%. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s return on equity of 6.33%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.09%. On the other hand Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has an analysts' consensus of $90.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, Inc., analysts believe Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) is more attractive than First Hawaiian, Inc..

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.866% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.86%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) pays out 53.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $292.4M, which are smaller than Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) quarterly revenues of $337.7M. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $69.9M is lower than Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s net income of $75.3M. Notably, First Hawaiian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s PE ratio is 18.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian, Inc. is 2.83x versus 3.25x for Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 23.92% compared to First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net margin of 19.96%. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.4%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.09%. On the other hand Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.62 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that First Hawaiian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe First Hawaiian, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc..

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.866% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.055%.

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $292.4M, which are smaller than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $504.4M. First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $69.9M is lower than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $100.7M. Notably, First Hawaiian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian, Inc. is 2.83x versus 2.36x for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.