FHB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bank of Hawaii has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 25.06%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.43%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.51%. On the other hand Bank of Hawaii has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.39%. Given that Bank of Hawaii has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Bank of Hawaii is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.862%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Bank of Hawaii offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Hawaii pays out 69.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues of $161M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Bank of Hawaii's net income of $40.4M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.56x while Bank of Hawaii's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.10x versus 4.29x for Bank of Hawaii. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 20.37%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.51%. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.11%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.679%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $65.3M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.56x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.10x versus 3.08x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 16.32%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.51%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.56x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.10x versus 2.91x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 27.77%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.51%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.56x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.10x versus 5.67x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.