CFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 16.32%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 14.6% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.24%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $518M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $146.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 4.31x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Horizon has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 27.18%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 14.6% beat First Horizon's return on equity of 8.71%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.24%. On the other hand First Horizon has an analysts' consensus of $21.80 which suggests that it could grow by 7.13%. Given that First Horizon has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe First Horizon is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Horizon has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.539%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. First Horizon offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. First Horizon pays out 40.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $518M, which are smaller than First Horizon quarterly revenues of $802M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $146.5M is lower than First Horizon's net income of $218M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while First Horizon's PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 4.31x versus 3.54x for First Horizon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanmi Financial has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 25.84%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 14.6% beat Hanmi Financial's return on equity of 8.99%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.24%. On the other hand Hanmi Financial has an analysts' consensus of $27.10 which suggests that it could grow by 13.87%. Given that Hanmi Financial has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Hanmi Financial is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanmi Financial has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.928%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Hanmi Financial offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanmi Financial pays out 38.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $518M, which are larger than Hanmi Financial quarterly revenues of $57.6M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $146.5M is higher than Hanmi Financial's net income of $14.9M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while Hanmi Financial's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 4.31x versus 3.09x for Hanmi Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 28.28% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 27.77%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 14.6% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.24%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.659% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Park National offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 39.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $518M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $146.5M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 4.31x versus 5.75x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.