CFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Horizon has a net margin of 28.87% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 23.61%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 15.29% beat First Horizon's return on equity of 8.45%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of $136.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand First Horizon has an analysts' consensus of $22.93 which suggests that it could grow by 18.09%. Given that First Horizon has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe First Horizon is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Horizon has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.493%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. First Horizon offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. First Horizon pays out 46.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $536.3M, which are smaller than First Horizon quarterly revenues of $703M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $154.9M is lower than First Horizon's net income of $166M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while First Horizon's PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 3.90x versus 3.42x for First Horizon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bank OZK has a net margin of 28.87% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 44.18%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 15.29% beat Bank OZK's return on equity of 13.21%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of $136.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Bank OZK has an analysts' consensus of $53.88 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that Bank OZK has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Bank OZK is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank OZK has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.903%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Bank OZK offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank OZK pays out 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $536.3M, which are larger than Bank OZK quarterly revenues of $412.3M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $154.9M is lower than Bank OZK's net income of $182.2M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Bank OZK's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 3.90x versus 3.01x for Bank OZK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 28.87% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 29.42%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 15.29% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of $136.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $26.60 which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.102%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $536.3M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $154.9M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $534M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 11.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 3.90x versus 2.78x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Capital Bancshares has a net margin of 28.87% compared to Cullen/Frost Bankers's net margin of 25.04%. Cullen/Frost Bankers's return on equity of 15.29% beat Texas Capital Bancshares's return on equity of 2.38%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus price target of $136.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.28%. On the other hand Texas Capital Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $84.54 which suggests that it could grow by 14.57%. Given that Texas Capital Bancshares has higher upside potential than Cullen/Frost Bankers, analysts believe Texas Capital Bancshares is more attractive than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Capital Bancshares has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.86%.

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Texas Capital Bancshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Capital Bancshares pays out 22.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cullen/Frost Bankers quarterly revenues are $536.3M, which are larger than Texas Capital Bancshares quarterly revenues of $283.7M. Cullen/Frost Bankers's net income of $154.9M is higher than Texas Capital Bancshares's net income of $71M. Notably, Cullen/Frost Bankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Texas Capital Bancshares's PE ratio is 58.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cullen/Frost Bankers is 3.90x versus 3.72x for Texas Capital Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.