HWC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Trust Bancorp has a net margin of 32.77% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 33.21%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Community Trust Bancorp's return on equity of 11.54%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $63.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand Community Trust Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $56.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.44%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Community Trust Bancorp, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Community Trust Bancorp.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Trust Bancorp has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.925%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Community Trust Bancorp offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Trust Bancorp pays out 40.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $364.7M, which are larger than Community Trust Bancorp quarterly revenues of $66.2M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M is higher than Community Trust Bancorp's net income of $22M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Community Trust Bancorp's PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.26x versus 3.59x for Community Trust Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Merchants has a net margin of 32.77% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 34.52%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat First Merchants's return on equity of 9.18%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $63.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand First Merchants has an analysts' consensus of $45.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that First Merchants has higher upside potential than Hancock Whitney, analysts believe First Merchants is more attractive than Hancock Whitney.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Merchants has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.745%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. First Merchants offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. First Merchants pays out 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $364.7M, which are larger than First Merchants quarterly revenues of $160.3M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M is higher than First Merchants's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while First Merchants's PE ratio is 10.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.26x versus 3.47x for First Merchants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 32.77% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 27.47%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $63.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.06%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.226%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $364.7M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 10.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.26x versus 2.72x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 32.77% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 24.09%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $63.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.26%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Hancock Whitney, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Hancock Whitney.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.506% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $364.7M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.26x versus 2.90x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.