BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oshkosh has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.58%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.72%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $119.30 which suggests that it could grow by 27.13%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.817%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.97x versus 0.58x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 11.8%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.72%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.51 which suggests that it could grow by 9.68%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than PACCAR.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.234%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.97x versus 1.59x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 1.61%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.72%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than The Shyft Group.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.285%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.97x versus 0.50x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -66.57%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.72%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 218.63%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.36x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.97x versus 0.34x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.