OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 7.97%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $119.30, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 21.78%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.11x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.58x versus 1.58x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.8%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $119.30, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.51 which suggests that it could grow by 9.68%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.234%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.11x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.58x versus 1.59x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 1.61%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $119.30, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.285%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Shyft Group's is not.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.11x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.58x versus 0.50x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $119.30, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 218.63%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.11x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.58x versus 0.34x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.