AIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 1.39% compared to AAR's net margin of 18.82%. AAR's return on equity of 4.04% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

AAR has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.71 which suggests that it could grow by 24.67%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

AAR has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.637%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $656.5M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. AAR's net income of $9.1M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.89x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 29.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.87x versus 2.43x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of 1.39% compared to AAR's net margin of 13.78%. AAR's return on equity of 4.04% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.04%.

AAR has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.28%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Heico.

AAR has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.482%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $656.5M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. AAR's net income of $9.1M is lower than Heico's net income of $139.7M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.89x while Heico's PE ratio is 50.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.87x versus 6.78x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 1.39% compared to AAR's net margin of 9.49%. AAR's return on equity of 4.04% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

AAR has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

AAR has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $656.5M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. AAR's net income of $9.1M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.89x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.87x versus 1.65x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of 1.39% compared to AAR's net margin of 4.13%. AAR's return on equity of 4.04% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $18.70 which suggests that it could grow by 1.81%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AAR has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.922%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $656.5M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $287.5M. AAR's net income of $9.1M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $11.9M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.89x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 2.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.87x versus 1.17x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.