BCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banc of California, Inc. has a net margin of 27.75% compared to California Bancorp's net margin of 16.89%. California Bancorp's return on equity of 11.54% beat Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56%.

California Bancorp has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Banc of California, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.62%. Given that California Bancorp has higher upside potential than Banc of California, Inc., analysts believe California Bancorp is more attractive than Banc of California, Inc..

California Bancorp has a beta of 0.265, which suggesting that the stock is 73.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.7%.

California Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Banc of California, Inc. offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. California Bancorp pays 5.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Banc of California, Inc. pays out 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Bancorp quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues of $458.2M. California Bancorp's net income of $16.4M is lower than Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M. Notably, California Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Banc of California, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Bancorp is 2.49x versus 1.78x for Banc of California, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bank of Marin Bancorp has a net margin of 27.75% compared to California Bancorp's net margin of 18%. California Bancorp's return on equity of 11.54% beat Bank of Marin Bancorp's return on equity of -8.29%.

California Bancorp has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Bank of Marin Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $30.80 which suggests that it could grow by 14.71%. Given that California Bancorp has higher upside potential than Bank of Marin Bancorp, analysts believe California Bancorp is more attractive than Bank of Marin Bancorp.

California Bancorp has a beta of 0.265, which suggesting that the stock is 73.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Marin Bancorp has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.438%.

California Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Bank of Marin Bancorp offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. California Bancorp pays 5.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Marin Bancorp pays out 192.62% of its earnings as a dividend. California Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bank of Marin Bancorp's is not.

California Bancorp quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are larger than Bank of Marin Bancorp quarterly revenues of -$24.8M. California Bancorp's net income of $16.4M is higher than Bank of Marin Bancorp's net income of -$39.5M. Notably, California Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Bank of Marin Bancorp's PE ratio is 44.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Bancorp is 2.49x versus 5.65x for Bank of Marin Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a net margin of 27.75% compared to California Bancorp's net margin of 17.91%. California Bancorp's return on equity of 11.54% beat Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s return on equity of 13.35%.

California Bancorp has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that California Bancorp has higher upside potential than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania), analysts believe California Bancorp is more attractive than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania).

California Bancorp has a beta of 0.265, which suggesting that the stock is 73.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a beta of -0.078, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.753%.

California Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. California Bancorp pays 5.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) pays out 27.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Bancorp quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are larger than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) quarterly revenues of $33.7M. California Bancorp's net income of $16.4M is higher than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s net income of $6M. Notably, California Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Bancorp is 2.49x versus 1.70x for Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial Corp. has a net margin of 27.75% compared to California Bancorp's net margin of 19.46%. California Bancorp's return on equity of 11.54% beat Tompkins Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 20.42%.

California Bancorp has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.65%. Given that California Bancorp has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial Corp., analysts believe California Bancorp is more attractive than Tompkins Financial Corp..

California Bancorp has a beta of 0.265, which suggesting that the stock is 73.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.13%.

California Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Tompkins Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. California Bancorp pays 5.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial Corp. pays out 22.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Bancorp quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $38.4M. California Bancorp's net income of $16.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial Corp.'s net income of $96.2M. Notably, California Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Tompkins Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Bancorp is 2.49x versus 2.93x for Tompkins Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.