BANC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fulton Financial Corp. has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Banc of California, Inc.'s net margin of 20.91%. Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56% beat Fulton Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.72%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.65, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Fulton Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.75 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Banc of California, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial Corp., analysts believe Banc of California, Inc. is more attractive than Fulton Financial Corp..

Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fulton Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.594%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Fulton Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Banc of California, Inc. pays 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial Corp. pays out 35.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.2M, which are smaller than Fulton Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $473.4M. Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M is lower than Fulton Financial Corp.'s net income of $99M. Notably, Banc of California, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.82x while Fulton Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California, Inc. is 1.85x versus 2.20x for Fulton Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Banc of California, Inc.'s net margin of 15.44%. Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56% beat Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.65, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.80 which suggests that it could grow by 6.79%. Given that Banc of California, Inc. has higher upside potential than Glacier Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Banc of California, Inc. is more attractive than Glacier Bancorp, Inc..

Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.161%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Banc of California, Inc. pays 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. pays out 66.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.2M, which are larger than Glacier Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $413.1M. Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M is higher than Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $63.8M. Notably, Banc of California, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.82x while Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California, Inc. is 1.85x versus 4.44x for Glacier Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Banc of California, Inc.'s net margin of 19.96%. Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56% beat Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.4%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.65, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.1%. Given that Banc of California, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Banc of California, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc..

Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.055%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Banc of California, Inc. pays 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Banc of California, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.2M, which are smaller than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $504.4M. Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M is lower than Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $100.7M. Notably, Banc of California, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.82x while Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California, Inc. is 1.85x versus 2.41x for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Banc of California, Inc.'s net margin of 21.9%. Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 7.87%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.65, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $14.68 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Banc of California, Inc. has higher upside potential than Valley National Bancorp, analysts believe Banc of California, Inc. is more attractive than Valley National Bancorp.

Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.228%.

Banc of California, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Banc of California, Inc. pays 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.2M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $892.2M. Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $195.4M. Notably, Banc of California, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.82x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California, Inc. is 1.85x versus 2.21x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.