LAZR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a net margin of -457.86% compared to 's net margin of 1.73%. 's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38%.

has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7861.78%. On the other hand Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.05%. Given that has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee), analysts believe is more attractive than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee).

has a beta of 1.474, which suggesting that the stock is 47.363% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.989%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays out 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues of $178.7M. 's net income of -$85.8M is lower than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 0.12x versus 0.53x for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of -457.86% compared to 's net margin of -74.84%. 's return on equity of -- beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7861.78%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.58 which suggests that it could fall by -21.52%. Given that has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, Inc., analysts believe is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

has a beta of 1.474, which suggesting that the stock is 47.363% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. 's net income of -$85.8M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 0.12x versus 4.14x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI Corp. has a net margin of -457.86% compared to 's net margin of -293.9%. 's return on equity of -- beat SES AI Corp.'s return on equity of -33.92%.

has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7861.78%. On the other hand SES AI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.06%. Given that has higher upside potential than SES AI Corp., analysts believe is more attractive than SES AI Corp..

has a beta of 1.474, which suggesting that the stock is 47.363% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than SES AI Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. 's net income of -$85.8M is lower than SES AI Corp.'s net income of -$20.9M. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 0.12x versus 36.38x for SES AI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport Ltd. has a net margin of -457.86% compared to 's net margin of -98.3%. 's return on equity of -- beat Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity of -95.2%.

has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7861.78%. On the other hand Worksport Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could grow by 240.91%. Given that has higher upside potential than Worksport Ltd., analysts believe is more attractive than Worksport Ltd..

has a beta of 1.474, which suggesting that the stock is 47.363% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport Ltd. has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.313%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are $18.7M, which are larger than Worksport Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5M. 's net income of -$85.8M is lower than Worksport Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 0.12x versus 0.83x for Worksport Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.