Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
42
NBBTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.06
Seasonality move
:
-11.87%
Day range:
$0.06 - $0.06
52-week range:
$0.05 - $0.10
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.16x
P/B ratio:
1.91x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
83
1-year change:
4.54%
Market cap:
$127.7M
Revenue:
$45.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBBTF
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBBTF
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $127.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.16x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.05 | -- | $11.4B | 14.24x | $0.13 | 3.29% | 2.13x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.42 | -- | $429.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.84x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.65 | -- | $78.6M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$3.82 | -- | $2.4M | 21.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBBTF
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.
|
29.3% | -0.787 | -- | 0.93x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBBTF
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -9.32% | -12.86% | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NBBTF or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.86% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.-- -- $87.3M CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NBBTF or CRHKY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NBBTF or CRHKY More Risky?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBBTF or CRHKY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBBTF or CRHKY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is 2.16x versus 2.13x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.2.16x -- -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.13x 14.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBBTF or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.86% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.-- -- $87.3M IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About NBBTF or IMG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11167.61%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NBBTF or IMG More Risky?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBBTF or IMG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBBTF or IMG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is 2.16x versus 2.84x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.2.16x -- -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.2.84x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns NBBTF or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.86% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.-- -- $87.3M PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBBTF or PTNM?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NBBTF or PTNM More Risky?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBBTF or PTNM?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBBTF or PTNM?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is 2.16x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.2.16x -- -- -- PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBBTF or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.86% beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.-- -- $87.3M RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About NBBTF or RAY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NBBTF or RAY More Risky?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBBTF or RAY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBBTF or RAY?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is 2.16x versus 0.18x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.2.16x -- -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0.18x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBBTF or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.86% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.-- -- $87.3M TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBBTF or TWG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NBBTF or TWG More Risky?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBBTF or TWG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBBTF or TWG?
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd. is 2.16x versus 4.11x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBBTFNatural Beauty Bio-Technology Ltd.2.16x -- -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.4.11x 21.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 22
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 2.59% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 22
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is down 3.03% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 22
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 9.97% over the past day.
