STAK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to STAK Inc.'s net margin of 6.46%. STAK Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.

STAK Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that STAK Inc. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe STAK Inc. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..

STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.672%.

STAK Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. STAK Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STAK Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. STAK Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, STAK Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.09x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STAK Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.48x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to STAK Inc.'s net margin of --. STAK Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.

STAK Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that STAK Inc. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe STAK Inc. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..

STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.086%.

STAK Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. STAK Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

STAK Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. STAK Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, STAK Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.09x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STAK Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.79x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to STAK Inc.'s net margin of 1.49%. STAK Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.

STAK Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that STAK Inc. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe STAK Inc. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..

STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.005%.

STAK Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. STAK Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STAK Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. STAK Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, STAK Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.09x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STAK Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.17x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to STAK Inc.'s net margin of 1.43%. STAK Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.

STAK Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that STAK Inc. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe STAK Inc. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..

STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.121%.

STAK Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. STAK Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

STAK Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. STAK Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, STAK Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.09x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STAK Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.