Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
54
SYH.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.56
Seasonality move
:
2.63%
Day range:
$0.51 - $0.56
52-week range:
$0.28 - $0.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
124.39x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
2.59x
Volume:
841.5K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
50%
Market cap:
$104.9M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYH.V
Skyharbour Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.87 |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.7500 |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYH.V
Skyharbour Resources Ltd.
|
$0.51 | $0.89 | $104.9M | 124.39x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
$0.88 | $0.87 | $193.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$3.30 | -- | $47.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
$0.4150 | $1.7500 | $101.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
$0.08 | -- | $11M | 1.92x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYH.V
Skyharbour Resources Ltd.
|
-- | 2.157 | -- | 5.59x |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
1.94% | -1.970 | 0.32% | 5.75x |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
0.02% | 22.619 | 0.01% | 2.44x |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -4.608 | -- | 7.86x |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
3.32% | 0.579 | 1.6% | 6.68x |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | 0.394 | -- | 176.95x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYH.V
Skyharbour Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -$784K | 2.08% | 2.08% | -- | -$3.3M |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-$44K | -$3.5M | -72.53% | -74.84% | -- | -$4.9M |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$3.2M | -13.54% | -13.83% | -- | -$4.1M |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$504.5K | -9.77% | -9.77% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
-$19.5K | -$206.1K | -118.57% | -122.09% | -- | -$160.8K |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$48K | -8.94% | -8.94% | -- | -$20.6K |
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SYH.V or CVV.V?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08% beat CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- $0.00 $40.5M CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SYH.V or CVV.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.89, signalling upside risk potential of 73.53%. On the other hand CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.87 which suggests that it could fall by -1.03%. Given that Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd., analysts believe Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is more attractive than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.2 0 0 CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.3 0 0 -
Is SYH.V or CVV.V More Risky?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.23%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYH.V or CVV.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyharbour Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SYH.V or CVV.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net income of $524.3K is higher than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- 124.39x -- $524.3K CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SYH.V or FAT.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08% beat Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- $0.00 $40.5M FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SYH.V or FAT.CX?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.89, signalling upside risk potential of 73.53%. On the other hand Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.2 0 0 FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is SYH.V or FAT.CX More Risky?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYH.V or FAT.CX?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyharbour Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SYH.V or FAT.CX?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net income of $524.3K is higher than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- 124.39x -- $524.3K FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SYH.V or FSY.TO?
Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- $0.00 $40.5M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $25.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SYH.V or FSY.TO?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.89, signalling upside risk potential of 73.53%. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 321.69%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Skyharbour Resources Ltd., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than Skyharbour Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.2 0 0 FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.1 0 0 -
Is SYH.V or FSY.TO More Risky?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.467%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYH.V or FSY.TO?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyharbour Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SYH.V or FSY.TO?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net income of $524.3K is higher than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- 124.39x -- $524.3K FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$547.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns SYH.V or GCOM.V?
Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08% beat Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s return on equity of -122.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- $0.00 $40.5M GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.-- -$0.00 $3.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SYH.V or GCOM.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.89, signalling upside risk potential of 73.53%. On the other hand Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green Shift Commodities Ltd., analysts believe Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Green Shift Commodities Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.2 0 0 GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SYH.V or GCOM.V More Risky?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.084%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYH.V or GCOM.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green Shift Commodities Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyharbour Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green Shift Commodities Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SYH.V or GCOM.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Green Shift Commodities Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net income of $524.3K is higher than Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s net income of -$80.9K. Notably, Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s PE ratio is 1.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Green Shift Commodities Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- 124.39x -- $524.3K GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.-- 1.92x -- -$80.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SYH.V or KIP.V?
Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08% beat Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- $0.00 $40.5M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SYH.V or KIP.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.89, signalling upside risk potential of 73.53%. On the other hand Kiplin Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.2 0 0 KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SYH.V or KIP.V More Risky?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.149, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.119%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYH.V or KIP.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kiplin Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyharbour Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SYH.V or KIP.V?
Skyharbour Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s net income of $524.3K is higher than Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K. Notably, Skyharbour Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyharbour Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Kiplin Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SYH.VSkyharbour Resources Ltd.-- 124.39x -- $524.3K KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$42K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
51
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 10
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 10
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
Sell
10
MOH alert for Feb 10
Molina Healthcare, Inc. [MOH] is down 3% over the past day.
