KIP.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, which suggesting that the stock is 97.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.315%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K is higher than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kiplin Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Atomic Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -7098.77%. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94% beat Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Atomic Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 133.33%. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, which suggesting that the stock is 97.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.377%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Atomic Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Atomic Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues of $369.6K. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K is lower than Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Atomic Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kiplin Metals, Inc. is -- versus 193.93x for Global Atomic Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Uranium Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94% beat Global Uranium Corp.'s return on equity of -557.44%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Uranium Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kiplin Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Uranium Corp., analysts believe Kiplin Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Global Uranium Corp..

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, which suggesting that the stock is 97.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Uranium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Uranium Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Uranium Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Uranium Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K is higher than Global Uranium Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Uranium Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kiplin Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Global Uranium Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacifica Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94% beat Pacifica Silver Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacifica Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kiplin Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pacifica Silver Corp., analysts believe Kiplin Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Pacifica Silver Corp..

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, which suggesting that the stock is 97.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacifica Silver Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacifica Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacifica Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Pacifica Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K is higher than Pacifica Silver Corp.'s net income of -$199.9K. Notably, Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacifica Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kiplin Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Pacifica Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.