Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
32
CVV.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.61
Seasonality move
:
44.22%
Day range:
$0.61 - $0.70
52-week range:
$0.51 - $1.26
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
4.28x
Volume:
599.3K
Avg. volume:
819.6K
1-year change:
-17.57%
Market cap:
$136.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.68 |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.7500 |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
$0.62 | $1.68 | $136.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$3.28 | -- | $47.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
$0.3150 | $1.7500 | $77.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$0.74 | $1.75 | $301.8M | 25.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 191.35x |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
$0.12 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
$1.67 | -- | $101.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
1.94% | 1.408 | 0.32% | 5.75x |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
0.02% | 15.046 | 0.01% | 2.44x |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -2.201 | -- | 7.86x |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
1.9% | 1.127 | 2.19% | 0.17x |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
2.41% | 0.095 | 0.24% | 0.85x |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-$44K | -$3.5M | -72.53% | -74.84% | -- | -$4.9M |
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$3.2M | -13.54% | -13.83% | -- | -$4.1M |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$504.5K | -9.77% | -9.77% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$318.4K | -$1.1M | -1.64% | -1.68% | -305.25% | -$23.6M |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -$1.1M | -544.88% | -557.44% | -- | -$1M |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -$199.3K | -- | -- | -- | -$62.4K |
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CVV.V or FAT.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net margin of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84% beat Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CVV.V or FAT.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.68, signalling upside risk potential of 171.11%. On the other hand Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.1 0 0 FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is CVV.V or FAT.CX More Risky?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, which suggesting that the stock is 121.23% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.756%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVV.V or FAT.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CVV.V or FAT.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is -- versus -- for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CVV.V or FSY.TO?
Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net margin of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $25.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CVV.V or FSY.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.68, signalling upside risk potential of 171.11%. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.1 0 0 FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.1 0 0 -
Is CVV.V or FSY.TO More Risky?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, which suggesting that the stock is 121.23% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVV.V or FSY.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CVV.V or FSY.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is -- versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$547.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns CVV.V or GLO.TO?
Global Atomic Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net margin of -7098.77%. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84% beat Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CVV.V or GLO.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.68, signalling upside risk potential of 171.11%. On the other hand Global Atomic Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 136.49%. Given that CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Atomic Corp., analysts believe CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Global Atomic Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.1 0 0 GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 -
Is CVV.V or GLO.TO More Risky?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, which suggesting that the stock is 121.23% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVV.V or GLO.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Atomic Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Atomic Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CVV.V or GLO.TO?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues of $369.6K. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Atomic Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is -- versus 191.35x for Global Atomic Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.191.35x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CVV.V or GURN.CX?
Global Uranium Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net margin of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84% beat Global Uranium Corp.'s return on equity of -557.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -$0.02 $810.6K -
What do Analysts Say About CVV.V or GURN.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.68, signalling upside risk potential of 171.11%. On the other hand Global Uranium Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Uranium Corp., analysts believe CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Global Uranium Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.1 0 0 GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CVV.V or GURN.CX More Risky?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, which suggesting that the stock is 121.23% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Uranium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVV.V or GURN.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Uranium Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Uranium Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CVV.V or GURN.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Uranium Corp. quarterly revenues of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Global Uranium Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Uranium Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is -- versus -- for Global Uranium Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -- -- -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CVV.V or PSIL.CX?
Pacifica Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net margin of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84% beat Pacifica Silver Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CVV.V or PSIL.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $1.68, signalling upside risk potential of 171.11%. On the other hand Pacifica Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacifica Silver Corp., analysts believe CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Pacifica Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.1 0 0 PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CVV.V or PSIL.CX More Risky?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, which suggesting that the stock is 121.23% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacifica Silver Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVV.V or PSIL.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacifica Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacifica Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CVV.V or PSIL.CX?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Pacifica Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of --. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Pacifica Silver Corp.'s net income of -$199.9K. Notably, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacifica Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is -- versus -- for Pacifica Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -- -- -$199.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
Sell
32
SMX alert for Dec 24
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 8.94% over the past day.
