Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
35
FAT.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.45
Seasonality move
:
65.26%
Day range:
$3.44 - $3.54
52-week range:
$0.86 - $7.75
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.51x
Volume:
13.5K
Avg. volume:
23.7K
1-year change:
58.26%
Market cap:
$49.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.7500 |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$3.45 | -- | $49.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
$0.3150 | $1.7500 | $77.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$0.75 | $1.75 | $305.8M | 25.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 193.93x |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $7.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
$0.28 | -- | $3.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
$1.79 | -- | $108.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
0.02% | 15.046 | 0.01% | 2.44x |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -2.201 | -- | 7.86x |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
1.9% | 1.127 | 2.19% | 0.17x |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
2.41% | 0.095 | 0.24% | 0.85x |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | 2.233 | -- | 176.95x |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$3.2M | -13.54% | -13.83% | -- | -$4.1M |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$504.5K | -9.77% | -9.77% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corp.
|
$318.4K | -$1.1M | -1.64% | -1.68% | -305.25% | -$23.6M |
|
GURN.CX
Global Uranium Corp.
|
-- | -$1.1M | -544.88% | -557.44% | -- | -$1M |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$48K | -8.94% | -8.94% | -- | -$20.6K |
|
PSIL.CX
Pacifica Silver Corp.
|
-- | -$199.3K | -- | -- | -- | -$62.4K |
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $25.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.1 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or FSY.TO More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, which suggesting that the stock is 89.756% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$547.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or GLO.TO?
Global Atomic Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -7098.77%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Global Atomic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.86.15% $0.02 $305.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or GLO.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Atomic Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 133.33%. Given that Global Atomic Corp. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Global Atomic Corp. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.2 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or GLO.TO More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, which suggesting that the stock is 89.756% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Atomic Corp. has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or GLO.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Atomic Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Atomic Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or GLO.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Atomic Corp. quarterly revenues of $369.6K. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Global Atomic Corp.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Atomic Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus 193.93x for Global Atomic Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M GLO.TOGlobal Atomic Corp.193.93x 25.50x $369.6K $5.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or GURN.CX?
Global Uranium Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Global Uranium Corp.'s return on equity of -557.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -$0.02 $810.6K -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or GURN.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Uranium Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Uranium Corp., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Global Uranium Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or GURN.CX More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, which suggesting that the stock is 89.756% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Uranium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or GURN.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Uranium Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Uranium Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or GURN.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Uranium Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Global Uranium Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Uranium Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Global Uranium Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M GURN.CXGlobal Uranium Corp.-- -- -- -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kiplin Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or KIP.V More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, which suggesting that the stock is 89.756% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kiplin Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Kiplin Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$42K
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or PSIL.CX?
Pacifica Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Pacifica Silver Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or PSIL.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacifica Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacifica Silver Corp., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Pacifica Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or PSIL.CX More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.898, which suggesting that the stock is 89.756% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacifica Silver Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or PSIL.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacifica Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacifica Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or PSIL.CX?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Pacifica Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Pacifica Silver Corp.'s net income of -$199.9K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacifica Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Pacifica Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M PSIL.CXPacifica Silver Corp.-- -- -- -$199.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
