Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
61
FAT.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.30
Seasonality move
:
4.83%
Day range:
$2.91 - $3.38
52-week range:
$0.86 - $7.75
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.45x
Volume:
31.1K
Avg. volume:
22.6K
1-year change:
110.19%
Market cap:
$47.6M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.87 |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.7500 |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -53.77% | $12.17 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$3.30 | -- | $47.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
$0.88 | $0.87 | $193.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
$0.4150 | $1.7500 | $101.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
$0.08 | -- | $11M | 1.92x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.
|
$7.97 | $12.17 | $856.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
0.02% | 22.619 | 0.01% | 2.44x |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
1.94% | -1.970 | 0.32% | 5.75x |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -4.608 | -- | 7.86x |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
3.32% | 0.579 | 1.6% | 6.68x |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | 0.394 | -- | 176.95x |
|
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.
|
35.21% | -2.229 | 4.56% | 1.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAT.CX
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -$3.2M | -13.54% | -13.83% | -- | -$4.1M |
|
CVV.V
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.
|
-$44K | -$3.5M | -72.53% | -74.84% | -- | -$4.9M |
|
FSY.TO
Forsys Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$504.5K | -9.77% | -9.77% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
GCOM.V
Green Shift Commodities Ltd.
|
-$19.5K | -$206.1K | -118.57% | -122.09% | -- | -$160.8K |
|
KIP.V
Kiplin Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$48K | -8.94% | -8.94% | -- | -$20.6K |
|
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.
|
-$688.6K | -$4.5M | -52.38% | -73.68% | -- | -$1.9M |
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or CVV.V?
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -74.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -$0.02 $32.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or CVV.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.87 which suggests that it could fall by -1.03%. Given that CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.3 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or CVV.V More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, which suggesting that the stock is 140.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 2.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.23%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or CVV.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or CVV.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M CVV.VCanAlaska Uranium Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Forsys Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Forsys Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $25.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forsys Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.7500 which suggests that it could grow by 321.69%. Given that Forsys Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Forsys Metals Corp. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.1 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or FSY.TO More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, which suggesting that the stock is 140.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forsys Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.467%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forsys Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forsys Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or FSY.TO?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forsys Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Forsys Metals Corp.'s net income of -$547.6K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forsys Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Forsys Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M FSY.TOForsys Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$547.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or GCOM.V?
Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s return on equity of -122.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.-- -$0.00 $3.7M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or GCOM.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green Shift Commodities Ltd., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Green Shift Commodities Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or GCOM.V More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, which suggesting that the stock is 140.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Shift Commodities Ltd. has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.084%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or GCOM.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green Shift Commodities Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green Shift Commodities Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or GCOM.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Green Shift Commodities Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s net income of -$80.9K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Green Shift Commodities Ltd.'s PE ratio is 1.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Green Shift Commodities Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M GCOM.VGreen Shift Commodities Ltd.-- 1.92x -- -$80.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kiplin Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kiplin Metals, Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Kiplin Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or KIP.V More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, which suggesting that the stock is 140.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiplin Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.149, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.119%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kiplin Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kiplin Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or KIP.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kiplin Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is lower than Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$42K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kiplin Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Kiplin Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M KIP.VKiplin Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$42K
-
Which has Higher Returns FAT.CX or UCU.V?
Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.83% beat Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -$0.21 $32.9M UCU.VUcore Rare Metals, Inc.-- -$0.25 $73.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FAT.CX or UCU.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.17 which suggests that it could grow by 52.66%. Given that Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Foremost Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.1 0 0 UCU.VUcore Rare Metals, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is FAT.CX or UCU.V More Risky?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.406, which suggesting that the stock is 140.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FAT.CX or UCU.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FAT.CX or UCU.V?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M is higher than Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$22.7M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Ucore Rare Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FAT.CXForemost Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -$2.6M UCU.VUcore Rare Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$22.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
67
PRLB alert for Feb 10
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
33
MSTR alert for Feb 10
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
Sell
10
MOH alert for Feb 10
Molina Healthcare, Inc. [MOH] is down 3% over the past day.
