BNKR.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.71%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunker Hill Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net income of -$38.7M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.71%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bunker Hill Mining Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Bunker Hill Mining Corp..

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunker Hill Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net income of -$38.7M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silver Valley Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Silver Valley Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -7.05%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.71%. On the other hand Silver Valley Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Silver Valley Metals Corp., analysts believe Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is more attractive than Silver Valley Metals Corp..

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silver Valley Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.71%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silver Valley Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunker Hill Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silver Valley Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Silver Valley Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net income of -$38.7M is lower than Silver Valley Metals Corp.'s net income of $804.1K. Notably, Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silver Valley Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is -- versus -- for Silver Valley Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net margin of 3.93%. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.25, signalling downside risk potential of -10.71%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $62.94 which suggests that it could grow by 6.14%. Given that Teck Resources Limited has higher upside potential than Bunker Hill Mining Corp., analysts believe Teck Resources Limited is more attractive than Bunker Hill Mining Corp..

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.25%.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Bunker Hill Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s net income of -$38.7M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Bunker Hill Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunker Hill Mining Corp. is -- versus 2.83x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.