Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
15
AMC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.66
Seasonality move
:
14.88%
Day range:
$0.63 - $0.66
52-week range:
$0.50 - $1.80
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
4.12x
Volume:
221.5K
Avg. volume:
395.8K
1-year change:
-49.61%
Market cap:
$89.5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.14
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -40.45% | $1.46 |
|
AAG.V
Aftermath Silver Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 |
|
DMX.V
District Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -14.53% | $1.55 |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -100% | $0.80 |
|
IBAT.V
International Battery Metals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
$0.65 | $1.46 | $89.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AAG.V
Aftermath Silver Ltd.
|
$1.00 | $1.30 | $337.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DMX.V
District Metals Corp.
|
$0.44 | -- | $73.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
$0.85 | $1.55 | $196M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
$0.47 | $0.80 | $203.6M | 5.95x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IBAT.V
International Battery Metals Ltd.
|
$0.1500 | -- | $44.5M | 3.15x | $0.00 | 0% | 41.17x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-- | -0.578 | -- | 14.98x |
|
AAG.V
Aftermath Silver Ltd.
|
0.29% | 4.461 | 0.04% | 7.84x |
|
DMX.V
District Metals Corp.
|
-- | 4.340 | -- | 34.56x |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-194.47% | -2.511 | 4.06% | 0.44x |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-- | 8.105 | -- | 8.02x |
|
IBAT.V
International Battery Metals Ltd.
|
0.58% | -1.848 | 0.4% | 5.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMC.TO
Arizona Metals Corp.
|
-$12.1K | -$4.3M | -75.51% | -75.51% | -- | -$3.4M |
|
AAG.V
Aftermath Silver Ltd.
|
-$3.4K | -$3.1M | -37.18% | -40.87% | -- | -$5.2M |
|
DMX.V
District Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$510.3K | -22.8% | -22.8% | -- | -$1.4M |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-$206K | -$1.9M | -129.02% | -195.5% | -- | -$624K |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-$40.1K | -$2.8M | -67.55% | -67.55% | -- | -$2.8M |
|
IBAT.V
International Battery Metals Ltd.
|
-$1.7M | -$4.7M | 32.58% | 32.74% | -5356.07% | -$3.3M |
Arizona Metals Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AMC.TO or AAG.V?
Aftermath Silver Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Arizona Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51% beat Aftermath Silver Ltd.'s return on equity of -40.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M AAG.VAftermath Silver Ltd.-- -$0.01 $36.9M -
What do Analysts Say About AMC.TO or AAG.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.46, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand Aftermath Silver Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.30 which suggests that it could grow by 30%. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Aftermath Silver Ltd., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than Aftermath Silver Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 AAG.VAftermath Silver Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is AMC.TO or AAG.V More Risky?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.576, which suggesting that the stock is 57.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aftermath Silver Ltd. has a beta of 2.757, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.667%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMC.TO or AAG.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aftermath Silver Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arizona Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aftermath Silver Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMC.TO or AAG.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aftermath Silver Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Aftermath Silver Ltd.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Arizona Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aftermath Silver Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arizona Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for Aftermath Silver Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M AAG.VAftermath Silver Ltd.-- -- -- -$3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMC.TO or DMX.V?
District Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Arizona Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51% beat District Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -22.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M DMX.VDistrict Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $19.6M -
What do Analysts Say About AMC.TO or DMX.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.46, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand District Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than District Metals Corp., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than District Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 DMX.VDistrict Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is AMC.TO or DMX.V More Risky?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.576, which suggesting that the stock is 57.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison District Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.715%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMC.TO or DMX.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. District Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arizona Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. District Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMC.TO or DMX.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than District Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than District Metals Corp.'s net income of -$363K. Notably, Arizona Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while District Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arizona Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for District Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M DMX.VDistrict Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$363K
-
Which has Higher Returns AMC.TO or FL.V?
Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Arizona Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51% beat Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -$0.01 -$2.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AMC.TO or FL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.46, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand Frontier Lithium, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.55 which suggests that it could grow by 82.35%. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Frontier Lithium, Inc., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than Frontier Lithium, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.1 1 0 -
Is AMC.TO or FL.V More Risky?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.576, which suggesting that the stock is 57.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.045%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMC.TO or FL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frontier Lithium, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arizona Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMC.TO or FL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Arizona Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arizona Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for Frontier Lithium, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -- -- -$1.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMC.TO or GRSL.V?
GR Silver Mining Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Arizona Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51% beat GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -67.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.-- -$0.01 $19.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AMC.TO or GRSL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.46, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand GR Silver Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.80 which suggests that it could grow by 70.21%. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than GR Silver Mining Ltd., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than GR Silver Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is AMC.TO or GRSL.V More Risky?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.576, which suggesting that the stock is 57.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GR Silver Mining Ltd. has a beta of 3.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 249.85%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMC.TO or GRSL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GR Silver Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arizona Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GR Silver Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMC.TO or GRSL.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GR Silver Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Arizona Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arizona Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for GR Silver Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.-- 5.95x -- -$2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMC.TO or IBAT.V?
International Battery Metals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Arizona Metals Corp.'s net margin of -3926.02%. Arizona Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -75.51% beat International Battery Metals Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -$0.03 $21.7M IBAT.VInternational Battery Metals Ltd.-1921.34% $0.01 $45M -
What do Analysts Say About AMC.TO or IBAT.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.46, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand International Battery Metals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arizona Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than International Battery Metals Ltd., analysts believe Arizona Metals Corp. is more attractive than International Battery Metals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.1 2 0 IBAT.VInternational Battery Metals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AMC.TO or IBAT.V More Risky?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a beta of 1.576, which suggesting that the stock is 57.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Battery Metals Ltd. has a beta of -0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.043%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMC.TO or IBAT.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Battery Metals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arizona Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Battery Metals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMC.TO or IBAT.V?
Arizona Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than International Battery Metals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $88.1K. Arizona Metals Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than International Battery Metals Ltd.'s net income of $4.1M. Notably, Arizona Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Battery Metals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arizona Metals Corp. is -- versus 41.17x for International Battery Metals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMC.TOArizona Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$4.1M IBAT.VInternational Battery Metals Ltd.41.17x 3.15x $88.1K $4.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
