GDL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Interfor Corp. has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of -17.42%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Interfor Corp.'s return on equity of -24.64%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interfor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 46.32%. Given that Interfor Corp. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Interfor Corp. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interfor Corp. has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.185%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Interfor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 58.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Interfor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfellow, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137M, which are smaller than Interfor Corp. quarterly revenues of $600.6M. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than Interfor Corp.'s net income of -$104.6M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Interfor Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.18x for Interfor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of 91.56%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 58.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stella-Jones, Inc. has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of 6.88%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Stella-Jones, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.81%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stella-Jones, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $101.44 which suggests that it could grow by 6.46%. Given that Stella-Jones, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Stella-Jones, Inc. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stella-Jones, Inc. has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.377%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Stella-Jones, Inc. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 58.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Stella-Jones, Inc. pays out 20.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137M, which are smaller than Stella-Jones, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727M. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is lower than Stella-Jones, Inc.'s net income of $50M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Stella-Jones, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.51x for Stella-Jones, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of -64.46%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.95%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $110.54 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.428, which suggesting that the stock is 57.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.976%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 58.75% of its earnings as a dividend. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. pays out 2020% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfellow, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s is not.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137M, which are smaller than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s net income of -$1B. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 56.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.92x for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.