GDL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Interfor Corp. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of -31.31%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.12% beat Interfor Corp.'s return on equity of -20.04%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interfor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that Interfor Corp. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Interfor Corp. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.33% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interfor Corp. has a beta of 1.966, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.59%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Interfor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 31.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Interfor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfellow, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $141.9M, which are smaller than Interfor Corp. quarterly revenues of $689.3M. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M is higher than Interfor Corp.'s net income of -$215.8M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while Interfor Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.20x for Interfor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of 19.16%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.12% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.47 which suggests that it could fall by -45.19%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.33% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 31.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfellow, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $141.9M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 730.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 6.28x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stella-Jones, Inc. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of 9.19%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.12% beat Stella-Jones, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.27%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stella-Jones, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $96.06 which suggests that it could fall by -1.8%. Given that Stella-Jones, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe Stella-Jones, Inc. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.33% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stella-Jones, Inc. has a beta of 0.278, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.158%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Stella-Jones, Inc. offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 31.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Stella-Jones, Inc. pays out 20.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $141.9M, which are smaller than Stella-Jones, Inc. quarterly revenues of $958M. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M is lower than Stella-Jones, Inc.'s net income of $88M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while Stella-Jones, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.56x for Stella-Jones, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Goodfellow, Inc.'s net margin of -15.61%. Goodfellow, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.12% beat West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -3.53%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $57.83 which suggests that it could fall by -42.37%. Given that West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Goodfellow, Inc., analysts believe West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Goodfellow, Inc..

Goodfellow, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.33% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.589%.

Goodfellow, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Goodfellow, Inc. pays 31.78% of its earnings as a dividend. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. pays out 2020% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfellow, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s is not.

Goodfellow, Inc. quarterly revenues are $141.9M, which are smaller than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Goodfellow, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M is higher than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s net income of -$281M. Notably, Goodfellow, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.31x while West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 56.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodfellow, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.00x for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.