Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
37
CGAA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.03
Seasonality move
:
0.37%
Day range:
$30.03 - $30.03
52-week range:
$25.37 - $31.34
Dividend yield:
1.54%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
609
1-year change:
5.33%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
$30.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$26.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.61% | -- |
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
$22.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 3.75% | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
$12.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.45% | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
$14.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.81% | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
$14.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.69% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.432 | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | 0.391 | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.398 | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.388 | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | 0.522 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or CBAL.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or FGBL.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or FGBL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than Forstrong Global Balanced ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than Forstrong Global Balanced ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or FGBL.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or FGBL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or FGBL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forstrong Global Balanced ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for Forstrong Global Balanced ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or HCON.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or HCON.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.847%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or ZESG.TO?
BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ESG ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ESG ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ESG ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ESG ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or ZESG.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.552%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. BMO Balanced ESG ETF offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ESG ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ESG ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ESG ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ESG ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ESG ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 0.39% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 4.68% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 2.81% over the past day.
