Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
41
CGAA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.59
Seasonality move
:
0.61%
Day range:
$30.59 - $30.59
52-week range:
$25.37 - $31.22
Dividend yield:
1.62%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
369
1-year change:
7.43%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCGI.TO
Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
$30.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 1.62% | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FCGI.TO
Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF
|
$15.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 3.17% | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
$11.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.71% | -- |
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$57.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 1.94% | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
$18.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.546 | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FCGI.TO
Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF
|
-- | 0.514 | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.656 | -- | -- |
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.565 | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | 0.515 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCGI.TO
Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or CSBA.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or CSBA.NO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or CSBA.NO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or CSBA.NO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or CSBA.NO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or FCGI.TO?
Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- FCGI.TOFidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or FCGI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 FCGI.TOFidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or FCGI.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF has a beta of 0.556, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.425%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or FCGI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or FCGI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- FCGI.TOFidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or FGEB.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or GBAL.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or GBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or GBAL.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.418%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or GBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or GBAL.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGAA.TO or ZMI.TO?
BMO Monthly Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net margin of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Monthly Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGAA.TO or ZMI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Monthly Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Monthly Income ETF, analysts believe CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is more attractive than BMO Monthly Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGAA.TO or ZMI.TO More Risky?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.394% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Monthly Income ETF has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.784%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGAA.TO or ZMI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. BMO Monthly Income ETF offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Monthly Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGAA.TO or ZMI.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Monthly Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Monthly Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Monthly Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Monthly Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -- ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
