Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
1
FGBL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.23
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$22.46 - $22.46
52-week range:
$20.10 - $22.59
Dividend yield:
3.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
4
1-year change:
7.63%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBL.TO
Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
$22.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 3.75% | -- |
|
CBL.TO
Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series
|
$23.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.38% | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
$30.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | 0.391 | -- | -- |
|
CBL.TO
Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series
|
-- | 0.489 | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.432 | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FGBL.TO
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBL.TO
Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSBA.NO
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FGBL.TO or CBL.TO?
Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- CBL.TOFranklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FGBL.TO or CBL.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series, analysts believe Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is more attractive than Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF0 0 0 CBL.TOFranklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is FGBL.TO or CBL.TO More Risky?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGBL.TO or CBL.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FGBL.TO or CBL.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- -- CBL.TOFranklin Core ETF Portfolio ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FGBL.TO or CGAA.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FGBL.TO or CGAA.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF, analysts believe Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is more attractive than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF0 0 0 CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 -
Is FGBL.TO or CGAA.TO More Risky?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGBL.TO or CGAA.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FGBL.TO or CGAA.TO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of --. Notably, Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FGBL.TO or CSBA.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net margin of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FGBL.TO or CSBA.NO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF, analysts believe Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF0 0 0 CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF0 0 0 -
Is FGBL.TO or CSBA.NO More Risky?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGBL.TO or CSBA.NO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FGBL.TO or CSBA.NO?
Forstrong Global Balanced ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF quarterly revenues of --. Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's net income of --. Notably, Forstrong Global Balanced ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forstrong Global Balanced ETF is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FGBL.TOForstrong Global Balanced ETF-- -- -- -- CSBA.NOCIBC Sustainable Balanced Solution ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 2.31% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 9.84% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 0.76% over the past day.
