Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
45
HCON.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.76
Seasonality move
:
-1.44%
Day range:
$14.76 - $14.80
52-week range:
$13.22 - $15.07
Dividend yield:
2.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.5K
Avg. volume:
2.1K
1-year change:
5.05%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
$14.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.81% | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$25.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.87% | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
$11.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.71% | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
$28.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.07% | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.55% | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
$14.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.71% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.373 | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.530 | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.656 | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.683 | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.568 | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | 0.599 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGRW.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or CBAL.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or FGEB.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or HGRW.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or HGRW.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- HGRW.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or TBAL.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.808%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ESG ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ESG ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ESG ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ESG ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or ZESG.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. BMO Balanced ESG ETF offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ESG ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ESG ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ESG ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ESG ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ESG ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
