Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
39
HCON.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.95
Seasonality move
:
-1.44%
Day range:
$14.85 - $15.02
52-week range:
$13.22 - $15.23
Dividend yield:
2.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.9K
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
5.13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
$14.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.81% | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$26.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.61% | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
$30.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
$12.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.45% | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.47% | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
$14.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.69% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.388 | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.432 | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 0.398 | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.557 | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | 0.522 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGEB.TO
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or CBAL.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or CBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or CGAA.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or CGAA.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or CGAA.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or CGAA.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or CGAA.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or FGEB.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or FGEB.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- FGEB.TOFidelity Global Equity+ Balanced Fund ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or TBAL.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or TBAL.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ESG ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ESG ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ESG ETF, analysts believe Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ESG ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF0 0 0 -
Is HCON.TO or ZESG.TO More Risky?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.552%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. BMO Balanced ESG ETF offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ESG ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HCON.TO or ZESG.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ESG ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ESG ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ESG ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ESG ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 47.98% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is down 31.47% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 28.97% over the past day.
