Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
70
CBAL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.86
Seasonality move
:
4.79%
Day range:
$25.86 - $25.86
52-week range:
$21.59 - $25.96
Dividend yield:
1.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
6.2K
1-year change:
9.16%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$25.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.87% | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
$14.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.81% | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$33.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.6% | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$25.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.33% | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
$14.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.98% | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
$14.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.71% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.530 | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.373 | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.605 | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | 0.599 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCON.TO
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAL.TO or HCON.TO?
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAL.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBAL.TO or HCON.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.798%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAL.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAL.TO or HCON.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- HCON.TOGlobal X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is CBAL.TO or XBAL.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.015%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is CBAL.TO or XCNS.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.564%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
BMO Balanced ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. BMO Balanced ETF offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAL.TO or ZESG.TO?
BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ESG ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAL.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ESG ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ESG ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ESG ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBAL.TO or ZESG.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAL.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. BMO Balanced ESG ETF offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ESG ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAL.TO or ZESG.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ESG ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ESG ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ESG ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ESG ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
