Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
46
XCNS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.37
Seasonality move
:
-0.24%
Day range:
$25.37 - $25.46
52-week range:
$22.22 - $25.82
Dividend yield:
2.33%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
34K
Avg. volume:
10.2K
1-year change:
6.02%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$25.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.33% | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
$25.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.87% | -- |
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$28.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.13% | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$33.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.6% | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
$14.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.98% | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
$14.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 1.71% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.530 | -- | -- |
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.564 | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.605 | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | 0.599 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAL.TO
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XCNS.TO or CBAL.TO?
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCNS.TO or CBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCNS.TO or CBAL.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCNS.TO or CBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCNS.TO or CBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CBAL.TOCI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCNS.TO or MBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCNS.TO or MBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCNS.TO or MBAL.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCNS.TO or MBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCNS.TO or MBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCNS.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCNS.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is XCNS.TO or XBAL.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.015%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCNS.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCNS.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCNS.TO or ZBAL.TO?
BMO Balanced ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCNS.TO or ZBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than BMO Balanced ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCNS.TO or ZBAL.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCNS.TO or ZBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. BMO Balanced ETF offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCNS.TO or ZBAL.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCNS.TO or ZESG.TO?
BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ESG ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCNS.TO or ZESG.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ESG ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ESG ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than BMO Balanced ESG ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCNS.TO or ZESG.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.564% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ESG ETF has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCNS.TO or ZESG.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.33%. BMO Balanced ESG ETF offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ESG ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCNS.TO or ZESG.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ESG ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ESG ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ESG ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ESG ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- ZESG.TOBMO Balanced ESG ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
