Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
67
MBAL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.40
Seasonality move
:
-0.58%
Day range:
$28.40 - $28.43
52-week range:
$23.59 - $28.64
Dividend yield:
2.13%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
833
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
9.34%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
$28.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.13% | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.55% | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$33.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.6% | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$25.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.33% | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
$14.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.98% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.564 | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.568 | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.605 | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MBAL.TO
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBAL.TO
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MBAL.TO or TBAL.TO?
TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MBAL.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MBAL.TO or TBAL.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.808%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MBAL.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MBAL.TO or TBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for TD Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- TBAL.TOTD Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MBAL.TO or XBAL.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.015%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MBAL.TO or XBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XBAL.TOiShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is MBAL.TO or XCNS.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.564%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
BMO Balanced ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Balanced ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Balanced ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Balanced ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Balanced ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF0 0 0 -
Is MBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Balanced ETF has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. BMO Balanced ETF offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Balanced ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MBAL.TO or ZBAL.TO?
Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Balanced ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Balanced ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Balanced ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Balanced ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MBAL.TOMackenzie Balanced Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZBAL.TOBMO Balanced ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
