Financhill
Buy
63

ATH.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.92
Seasonality move :
-0.01%
Day range:
$6.81 - $6.90
52-week range:
$4.05 - $8.05
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.77x
P/S ratio:
2.62x
P/B ratio:
1.88x
Volume:
7.8M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
41.1%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
-- $0.15 14.33% -69.88% $7.86
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
$1.4B $0.57 5.91% -29.94% $31.05
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
$745.4M $0.07 -1.51% -69.76% $5.03
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
$118.1M $0.08 3.36% -49.84% $8.63
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
$9.4B $0.81 -0.26% 28.94% $52.43
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
$652M $0.46 -38.72% 41.33% $38.78
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
$6.90 $7.86 $3.4B 7.77x $0.00 0% 2.62x
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
$25.00 $31.05 $14.4B 10.59x $0.19 3.04% 2.50x
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
$4.29 $5.03 $3.3B 15.44x $0.02 2.1% 1.09x
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
$8.45 $8.63 $1.4B 17.85x $0.06 8.52% 3.03x
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
$43.99 $52.43 $91.6B 13.92x $0.59 5.34% 2.40x
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
$39.55 $38.78 $8.5B 7.72x $10.00 2.93% 1.99x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
10.01% 0.461 5.87% 1.78x
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
31.93% -0.354 27.09% 0.36x
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
32.46% 2.312 81.07% 0.52x
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
19.49% 0.942 18.14% 0.41x
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
31.63% 0.695 20.17% 0.46x
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
16.27% 0.772 16.7% 0.69x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
$114.8M $98.5M 22.82% 25.27% 30.63% $61.2M
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
$369.5M $345.1M 12.84% 17.2% 24.98% $216.6M
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
$165.9M $134.4M 3.4% 5.2% 18.01% $142M
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
$27.3M $19.4M 7.31% 8.42% 18.65% $7.6M
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
$1.3B $1.1B 11.5% 16.51% 11.39% $1.8B
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
$287.4M $263.8M 6.82% 9.82% 28.38% $6.9M

Athabasca Oil Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ATH.TO or ARX.TO?

    ARC Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 15.52%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat ARC Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    35.71% $0.14 $2.1B
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources Ltd.
    26.74% $0.37 $12.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATH.TO or ARX.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand ARC Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $31.05 which suggests that it could grow by 24.21%. Given that ARC Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe ARC Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Athabasca Oil Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    3 4 0
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources Ltd.
    13 2 0
  • Is ATH.TO or ARX.TO More Risky?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ARC Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.42%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATH.TO or ARX.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ARC Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd. pays out 37.04% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATH.TO or ARX.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than ARC Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is lower than ARC Resources Ltd.'s net income of $214.4M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while ARC Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.62x versus 2.50x for ARC Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    2.62x 7.77x $321.5M $70.1M
    ARX.TO
    ARC Resources Ltd.
    2.50x 10.59x $1.4B $214.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATH.TO or BTE.TO?

    Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 4.28%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    35.71% $0.14 $2.1B
    BTE.TO
    Baytex Energy Corp.
    22.22% $0.04 $6.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATH.TO or BTE.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.03 which suggests that it could grow by 17.29%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Athabasca Oil Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    3 4 0
    BTE.TO
    Baytex Energy Corp.
    3 4 0
  • Is ATH.TO or BTE.TO More Risky?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17200000000001%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATH.TO or BTE.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATH.TO or BTE.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is higher than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.62x versus 1.09x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    2.62x 7.77x $321.5M $70.1M
    BTE.TO
    Baytex Energy Corp.
    1.09x 15.44x $746.4M $32M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATH.TO or CJ.TO?

    Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 13.25%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    35.71% $0.14 $2.1B
    CJ.TO
    Cardinal Energy Ltd.
    26.25% $0.09 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATH.TO or CJ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand Cardinal Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 2.07%. Given that Athabasca Oil Corp. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Athabasca Oil Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    3 4 0
    CJ.TO
    Cardinal Energy Ltd.
    0 5 0
  • Is ATH.TO or CJ.TO More Risky?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.341%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATH.TO or CJ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cardinal Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 8.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays out 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATH.TO or CJ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are larger than Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $104.2M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is higher than Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.62x versus 3.03x for Cardinal Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    2.62x 7.77x $321.5M $70.1M
    CJ.TO
    Cardinal Energy Ltd.
    3.03x 17.85x $104.2M $13.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATH.TO or CNQ.TO?

    Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 6.31%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    35.71% $0.14 $2.1B
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
    13.65% $0.29 $59.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATH.TO or CNQ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.43 which suggests that it could grow by 20.26%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Athabasca Oil Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    3 4 0
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
    10 9 0
  • Is ATH.TO or CNQ.TO More Risky?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.951%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATH.TO or CNQ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays out 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATH.TO or CNQ.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is lower than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.62x versus 2.40x for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    2.62x 7.77x $321.5M $70.1M
    CNQ.TO
    Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
    2.40x 13.92x $9.5B $600M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATH.TO or SCR.TO?

    Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 15.55%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    35.71% $0.14 $2.1B
    SCR.TO
    Strathcona Resources Ltd.
    30.91% $2.68 $7.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATH.TO or SCR.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.86, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand Strathcona Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $38.78 which suggests that it could fall by -1.95%. Given that Athabasca Oil Corp. has higher upside potential than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Athabasca Oil Corp. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    3 4 0
    SCR.TO
    Strathcona Resources Ltd.
    0 8 0
  • Is ATH.TO or SCR.TO More Risky?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATH.TO or SCR.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strathcona Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays out 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATH.TO or SCR.TO?

    Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $929.7M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is lower than Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.62x versus 1.99x for Strathcona Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATH.TO
    Athabasca Oil Corp.
    2.62x 7.77x $321.5M $70.1M
    SCR.TO
    Strathcona Resources Ltd.
    1.99x 7.72x $929.7M $144.6M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 22

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 2.59% over the past day.

Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 22

BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is down 3.03% over the past day.

Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 22

Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 9.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock