ATH.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 4.28%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.26%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.03 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Athabasca Oil Corp..

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17200000000001%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is higher than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.80x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.96x versus 1.14x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 13.25%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.26%. On the other hand Cardinal Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.46 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has more downside risk than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Athabasca Oil Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.341%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cardinal Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 7.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays out 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are larger than Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $104.2M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is higher than Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.80x while Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.96x versus 3.25x for Cardinal Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 6.31%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.26%. On the other hand Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.95 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Athabasca Oil Corp..

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.951%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays out 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is lower than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.80x while Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.96x versus 2.62x for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 21.8% compared to Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net margin of 15.55%. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27% beat Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.26%. On the other hand Strathcona Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $38.33 which suggests that it could fall by -11.98%. Given that Strathcona Resources Ltd. has more downside risk than Athabasca Oil Corp., analysts believe Athabasca Oil Corp. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Athabasca Oil Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strathcona Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays out 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues are $321.5M, which are smaller than Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $929.7M. Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M is lower than Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M. Notably, Athabasca Oil Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.80x while Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Athabasca Oil Corp. is 2.96x versus 2.19x for Strathcona Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.