Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
56
CNQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$47.57
Seasonality move
:
8.27%
Day range:
$47.91 - $48.74
52-week range:
$34.92 - $49.20
Dividend yield:
4.85%
P/E ratio:
15.18x
P/S ratio:
2.62x
P/B ratio:
2.47x
Volume:
33M
Avg. volume:
14M
1-year change:
2.83%
Market cap:
$99.9B
Revenue:
$35.7B
EPS (TTM):
$3.16
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$9.4B | $0.81 | 4.4% | 42.98% | $52.95 |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$745.4M | $0.07 | -1.51% | -69.76% | $5.03 |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$13.5B | $0.75 | -11.21% | 321.2% | $29.59 |
|
ENB.TO
Enbridge, Inc.
|
$11.9B | $0.51 | -22.37% | 254.4% | $70.64 |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$12.7B | $1.96 | 2.96% | -21.13% | $113.06 |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$12.7B | $1.14 | 0.75% | 69.08% | $66.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$47.96 | $52.95 | $99.9B | 15.18x | $0.59 | 4.85% | 2.62x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$4.51 | $5.03 | $3.5B | 16.23x | $0.02 | 2% | 1.14x |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$25.35 | $29.59 | $47.8B | 14.76x | $0.20 | 3% | 0.93x |
|
ENB.TO
Enbridge, Inc.
|
$66.58 | $70.64 | $145.3B | 25.98x | $0.94 | 5.66% | 2.27x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$127.84 | $113.06 | $63.5B | 16.34x | $0.72 | 2.25% | 1.41x |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$61.19 | $66.50 | $73.5B | 14.32x | $0.60 | 3.78% | 1.53x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
31.63% | 0.695 | 20.17% | 0.46x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
32.46% | 2.312 | 81.07% | 0.52x |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
26.11% | 1.370 | 23.99% | 0.78x |
|
ENB.TO
Enbridge, Inc.
|
61.41% | 0.525 | 63.41% | 0.50x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
15.14% | 1.819 | 6.74% | 1.04x |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
24.24% | 1.294 | 20.58% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $1.1B | 11.5% | 16.51% | 11.39% | $1.8B |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$165.9M | $134.4M | 3.4% | 5.2% | 18.01% | $142M |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$1.7B | $1.5B | 7.89% | 10.67% | 10.99% | $977M |
|
ENB.TO
Enbridge, Inc.
|
$4.7B | $2.2B | 3.68% | 9.07% | 14.76% | $603M |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $679M | 14.13% | 16.64% | 5.85% | $1.3B |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$5.7B | $2.4B | 8.83% | 11.73% | 19.25% | $2.3B |
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or BTE.TO?
Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 4.28%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.22.22% $0.04 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or BTE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $52.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.03 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.3 4 0 -
Is CNQ.TO or BTE.TO More Risky?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, which suggesting that the stock is 5.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17200000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or BTE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or BTE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M is higher than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.18x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is 2.62x versus 1.14x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.1.14x 16.23x $746.4M $32M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?
Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 9.75%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51% beat Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.12.66% $0.72 $38.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $52.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Cenovus Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.59 which suggests that it could grow by 16.72%. Given that Cenovus Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., analysts believe Cenovus Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is CNQ.TO or CVE.TO More Risky?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, which suggesting that the stock is 5.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.357%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Cenovus Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays out 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or CVE.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are smaller than Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2B. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M is lower than Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.18x while Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is 2.62x versus 0.93x for Cenovus Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.0.93x 14.76x $13.2B $1.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or ENB.TO?
Enbridge, Inc. has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 5.75%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51% beat Enbridge, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B ENB.TOEnbridge, Inc.31.62% $0.31 $172.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or ENB.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $52.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Enbridge, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $70.64 which suggests that it could grow by 6.1%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Enbridge, Inc., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Enbridge, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 ENB.TOEnbridge, Inc.8 11 1 -
Is CNQ.TO or ENB.TO More Risky?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, which suggesting that the stock is 5.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enbridge, Inc. has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.104%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or ENB.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Enbridge, Inc. offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Enbridge, Inc. pays out 156.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Enbridge, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or ENB.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are smaller than Enbridge, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.7B. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M is lower than Enbridge, Inc.'s net income of $847M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.18x while Enbridge, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is 2.62x versus 2.27x for Enbridge, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M ENB.TOEnbridge, Inc.2.27x 25.98x $14.7B $847M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?
Imperial Oil Ltd. has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 4.64%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51% beat Imperial Oil Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.11.2% $1.07 $27.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $52.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Imperial Oil Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $113.06 which suggests that it could fall by -11.56%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Imperial Oil Ltd., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Oil Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.3 8 6 -
Is CNQ.TO or IMO.TO More Risky?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, which suggesting that the stock is 5.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Oil Ltd. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Imperial Oil Ltd. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Oil Ltd. pays out 26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or IMO.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are smaller than Imperial Oil Ltd. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M is higher than Imperial Oil Ltd.'s net income of $539M. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.18x while Imperial Oil Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is 2.62x versus 1.41x for Imperial Oil Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.1.41x 16.34x $11.6B $539M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNQ.TO or SU.TO?
Suncor Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 6.31% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 12.9%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51% beat Suncor Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.45.3% $1.34 $59.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CNQ.TO or SU.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $52.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Suncor Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Suncor Energy, Inc., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Suncor Energy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.8 8 0 -
Is CNQ.TO or SU.TO More Risky?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, which suggesting that the stock is 5.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suncor Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.771%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNQ.TO or SU.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Suncor Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Suncor Energy, Inc. pays out 46.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNQ.TO or SU.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are smaller than Suncor Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M is lower than Suncor Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.18x while Suncor Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is 2.62x versus 1.53x for Suncor Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.1.53x 14.32x $12.6B $1.6B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 65.44% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.33% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.85% over the past day.
