Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
15
SCR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.13
Seasonality move
:
-1.65%
Day range:
$38.24 - $39.63
52-week range:
$22.75 - $45.09
Dividend yield:
2.96%
P/E ratio:
7.64x
P/S ratio:
1.97x
P/B ratio:
1.26x
Volume:
151.5K
Avg. volume:
149.6K
1-year change:
41.47%
Market cap:
$8.4B
Revenue:
$4.7B
EPS (TTM):
$5.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$652M | $0.46 | -38.72% | 41.33% | $38.78 |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$745.4M | $0.07 | -1.51% | -69.76% | $5.05 |
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$118.1M | $0.08 | 3.36% | -49.84% | $8.63 |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$9.4B | $0.81 | -0.26% | 28.94% | $52.43 |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$13.5B | $0.75 | -11.21% | 196.09% | $29.68 |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$12.7B | $1.96 | 2.96% | -20.24% | $113.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$39.16 | $38.78 | $8.4B | 7.64x | $10.00 | 2.96% | 1.97x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$4.31 | $5.05 | $3.3B | 15.51x | $0.02 | 2.09% | 1.09x |
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$8.60 | $8.63 | $1.4B | 18.17x | $0.06 | 8.37% | 3.08x |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$44.48 | $52.43 | $92.7B | 14.08x | $0.59 | 5.28% | 2.43x |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$23.01 | $29.68 | $43.4B | 13.39x | $0.20 | 3.39% | 0.84x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$117.19 | $113.00 | $58.2B | 14.98x | $0.72 | 2.46% | 1.29x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
16.27% | 0.772 | 16.7% | 0.69x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
32.46% | 2.312 | 81.07% | 0.52x |
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
19.49% | 0.942 | 18.14% | 0.41x |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
31.63% | 0.695 | 20.17% | 0.46x |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
26.11% | 1.370 | 23.99% | 0.78x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
15.14% | 1.819 | 6.74% | 1.04x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$287.4M | $263.8M | 6.82% | 9.82% | 28.38% | $6.9M |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$165.9M | $134.4M | 3.4% | 5.2% | 18.01% | $142M |
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$27.3M | $19.4M | 7.31% | 8.42% | 18.65% | $7.6M |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $1.1B | 11.5% | 16.51% | 11.39% | $1.8B |
|
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
|
$1.7B | $1.5B | 7.89% | 10.67% | 10.99% | $977M |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $679M | 14.13% | 16.64% | 5.85% | $1.3B |
Strathcona Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SCR.TO or BTE.TO?
Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 15.55% compared to Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 4.28%. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.22.22% $0.04 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SCR.TO or BTE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $38.78, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.05 which suggests that it could grow by 17.28%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.3 4 0 -
Is SCR.TO or BTE.TO More Risky?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17200000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCR.TO or BTE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCR.TO or BTE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $929.7M, which are larger than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M is higher than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.64x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strathcona Resources Ltd. is 1.97x versus 1.09x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.1.97x 7.64x $929.7M $144.6M BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.1.09x 15.51x $746.4M $32M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCR.TO or CJ.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 15.55% compared to Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 13.25%. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82% beat Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SCR.TO or CJ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $38.78, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Cardinal Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 0.29%. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 -
Is SCR.TO or CJ.TO More Risky?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.341%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCR.TO or CJ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Cardinal Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 8.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays out 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCR.TO or CJ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $929.7M, which are larger than Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $104.2M. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M is higher than Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.64x while Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strathcona Resources Ltd. is 1.97x versus 3.08x for Cardinal Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.1.97x 7.64x $929.7M $144.6M CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.08x 18.17x $104.2M $13.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCR.TO or CNQ.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 15.55% compared to Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 6.31%. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82% beat Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SCR.TO or CNQ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $38.78, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.43 which suggests that it could grow by 17.87%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 9 0 -
Is SCR.TO or CNQ.TO More Risky?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.951%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCR.TO or CNQ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 5.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays out 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCR.TO or CNQ.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $929.7M, which are smaller than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M is lower than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M. Notably, Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.64x while Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strathcona Resources Ltd. is 1.97x versus 2.43x for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.1.97x 7.64x $929.7M $144.6M CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.43x 14.08x $9.5B $600M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCR.TO or CVE.TO?
Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 15.55% compared to Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 9.75%. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82% beat Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.12.66% $0.72 $38.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SCR.TO or CVE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $38.78, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Cenovus Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.68 which suggests that it could grow by 28.97%. Given that Cenovus Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Cenovus Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is SCR.TO or CVE.TO More Risky?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.357%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCR.TO or CVE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Cenovus Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays out 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCR.TO or CVE.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $929.7M, which are smaller than Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2B. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M is lower than Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.64x while Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strathcona Resources Ltd. is 1.97x versus 0.84x for Cenovus Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.1.97x 7.64x $929.7M $144.6M CVE.TOCenovus Energy, Inc.0.84x 13.39x $13.2B $1.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns SCR.TO or IMO.TO?
Imperial Oil Ltd. has a net margin of 15.55% compared to Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 4.64%. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82% beat Imperial Oil Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.11.2% $1.07 $27.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SCR.TO or IMO.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $38.78, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Imperial Oil Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $113.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.58%. Given that Imperial Oil Ltd. has more downside risk than Strathcona Resources Ltd., analysts believe Strathcona Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Oil Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.1 8 7 -
Is SCR.TO or IMO.TO More Risky?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Oil Ltd. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCR.TO or IMO.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Imperial Oil Ltd. offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Oil Ltd. pays out 26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCR.TO or IMO.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are $929.7M, which are smaller than Imperial Oil Ltd. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M is lower than Imperial Oil Ltd.'s net income of $539M. Notably, Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.64x while Imperial Oil Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strathcona Resources Ltd. is 1.97x versus 1.29x for Imperial Oil Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.1.97x 7.64x $929.7M $144.6M IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.1.29x 14.98x $11.6B $539M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Buy
52
ABVX alert for Dec 23
Abivax SA [ABVX] is down 0.27% over the past day.
Buy
60
ZBIO alert for Dec 23
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
