Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
62
CJ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.08
Seasonality move
:
19.97%
Day range:
$9.06 - $9.20
52-week range:
$4.64 - $9.46
Dividend yield:
7.93%
P/E ratio:
19.18x
P/S ratio:
3.25x
P/B ratio:
1.64x
Volume:
424.6K
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
40.78%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$497.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.47
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$118.1M | $0.08 | 3.36% | -49.84% | $8.46 |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$745.4M | $0.07 | -1.51% | -69.76% | $5.03 |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$9.4B | $0.81 | 4.4% | 42.98% | $52.95 |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$12.7B | $1.96 | 2.96% | -21.13% | $113.06 |
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$652M | $0.46 | -38.72% | 41.33% | $38.33 |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$12.7B | $1.14 | 0.75% | 69.08% | $66.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$9.08 | $8.46 | $1.5B | 19.18x | $0.06 | 7.93% | 3.25x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$4.51 | $5.03 | $3.5B | 16.23x | $0.02 | 2% | 1.14x |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$47.96 | $52.95 | $99.9B | 15.18x | $0.59 | 4.85% | 2.62x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$127.84 | $113.06 | $63.5B | 16.34x | $0.72 | 2.25% | 1.41x |
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$43.55 | $38.33 | $9.3B | 8.50x | $0.30 | 2.66% | 2.19x |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$61.19 | $66.50 | $73.5B | 14.32x | $0.60 | 3.78% | 1.53x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
19.49% | 0.942 | 18.14% | 0.41x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
32.46% | 2.312 | 81.07% | 0.52x |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
31.63% | 0.695 | 20.17% | 0.46x |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
15.14% | 1.819 | 6.74% | 1.04x |
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
16.27% | 0.772 | 16.7% | 0.69x |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
24.24% | 1.294 | 20.58% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$27.3M | $19.4M | 7.31% | 8.42% | 18.65% | $7.6M |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$165.9M | $134.4M | 3.4% | 5.2% | 18.01% | $142M |
|
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $1.1B | 11.5% | 16.51% | 11.39% | $1.8B |
|
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $679M | 14.13% | 16.64% | 5.85% | $1.3B |
|
SCR.TO
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
|
$287.4M | $263.8M | 6.82% | 9.82% | 28.38% | $6.9M |
|
SU.TO
Suncor Energy, Inc.
|
$5.7B | $2.4B | 8.83% | 11.73% | 19.25% | $2.3B |
Cardinal Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 4.28%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.22.22% $0.04 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.03 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.3 4 0 -
Is CJ.TO or BTE.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17200000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.93%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.25x versus 1.14x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.25x 19.18x $104.2M $13.8M BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.1.14x 16.23x $746.4M $32M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or CNQ.TO?
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 6.31%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.13.65% $0.29 $59.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or CNQ.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.95 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.10 8 0 -
Is CJ.TO or CNQ.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.951%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or CNQ.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.93%. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. pays out 74.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or CNQ.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s net income of $600M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.25x versus 2.62x for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.25x 19.18x $104.2M $13.8M CNQ.TOCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.2.62x 15.18x $9.5B $600M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or IMO.TO?
Imperial Oil Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 4.64%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Imperial Oil Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.11.2% $1.07 $27.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or IMO.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Imperial Oil Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $113.06 which suggests that it could fall by -11.56%. Given that Imperial Oil Ltd. has more downside risk than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Oil Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.3 8 6 -
Is CJ.TO or IMO.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Oil Ltd. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or IMO.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.93%. Imperial Oil Ltd. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Oil Ltd. pays out 26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Oil Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or IMO.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Imperial Oil Ltd. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Imperial Oil Ltd.'s net income of $539M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Imperial Oil Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.25x versus 1.41x for Imperial Oil Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.25x 19.18x $104.2M $13.8M IMO.TOImperial Oil Ltd.1.41x 16.34x $11.6B $539M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or SCR.TO?
Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 15.55%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.30.91% $2.68 $7.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or SCR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Strathcona Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $38.33 which suggests that it could fall by -11.98%. Given that Strathcona Resources Ltd. has more downside risk than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Strathcona Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.0 8 0 -
Is CJ.TO or SCR.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strathcona Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or SCR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.93%. Strathcona Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd. pays out 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or SCR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Strathcona Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $929.7M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s net income of $144.6M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Strathcona Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.25x versus 2.19x for Strathcona Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.25x 19.18x $104.2M $13.8M SCR.TOStrathcona Resources Ltd.2.19x 8.50x $929.7M $144.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or SU.TO?
Suncor Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 12.9%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Suncor Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.45.3% $1.34 $59.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or SU.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Suncor Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Suncor Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Suncor Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.8 8 0 -
Is CJ.TO or SU.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suncor Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.771%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or SU.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.93%. Suncor Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Suncor Energy, Inc. pays out 46.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Suncor Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or SU.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Suncor Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Suncor Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Suncor Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.25x versus 1.53x for Suncor Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.25x 19.18x $104.2M $13.8M SU.TOSuncor Energy, Inc.1.53x 14.32x $12.6B $1.6B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 66.41% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.56% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.46% over the past day.
