Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Buy
57
CJ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.54
Seasonality move
:
17.66%
Day range:
$8.44 - $8.55
52-week range:
$4.64 - $9.46
Dividend yield:
8.43%
P/E ratio:
18.04x
P/S ratio:
3.06x
P/B ratio:
1.54x
Volume:
669.3K
Avg. volume:
553.6K
1-year change:
25.59%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$497.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.47
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$136.2M | $0.08 | 3.36% | -49.84% | $8.79 |
|
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
|
-- | $0.15 | 14.33% | -69.88% | $7.97 |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$155.8M | $0.08 | -27.96% | -38.08% | $8.90 |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$321.8M | $0.02 | -7.77% | -77.75% | $5.05 |
|
OBE.TO
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
|
-- | $0.17 | -- | -64.58% | $9.75 |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$393.4M | $0.67 | 69.27% | 72.76% | $24.09 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$8.54 | $8.79 | $1.4B | 18.04x | $0.06 | 8.43% | 3.06x |
|
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
|
$6.56 | $7.97 | $3.2B | 7.39x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.49x |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$7.13 | $8.90 | $1.9B | 26.68x | $0.03 | 1.68% | 2.92x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$4.61 | $5.05 | $3.5B | 16.59x | $0.02 | 1.95% | 1.17x |
|
OBE.TO
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
|
$8.58 | $9.75 | $575.9M | 6.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.02x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$21.82 | $24.09 | $4.4B | 11.83x | $0.11 | 6.05% | 4.42x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
19.49% | 1.108 | 18.14% | 0.41x |
|
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
|
10.01% | 0.860 | 5.87% | 1.78x |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
22.27% | -0.198 | 40.62% | 0.66x |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
32.46% | 2.619 | 81.07% | 0.52x |
|
OBE.TO
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
|
9.64% | 1.366 | 24.58% | 0.37x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
30.96% | -1.206 | 34.51% | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$27.3M | $19.4M | 7.31% | 8.42% | 18.65% | $7.6M |
|
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corp.
|
$114.8M | $98.5M | 22.82% | 25.27% | 30.63% | $61.2M |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$14.1M | $4.7M | 2.55% | 3.29% | 3.24% | $6.6M |
|
BTE.TO
Baytex Energy Corp.
|
$165.9M | $134.4M | 3.4% | 5.2% | 18.01% | $142M |
|
OBE.TO
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
|
$14.4M | $2.3M | -13.57% | -16.22% | 2.01% | -$20.2M |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$57.3M | $47M | 9.22% | 13.71% | 21.5% | $103.3M |
Cardinal Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or ATH.TO?
Athabasca Oil Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 21.8%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Athabasca Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 25.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B ATH.TOAthabasca Oil Corp.35.71% $0.14 $2.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or ATH.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 2.95%. On the other hand Athabasca Oil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.97 which suggests that it could grow by 21.53%. Given that Athabasca Oil Corp. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Athabasca Oil Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 ATH.TOAthabasca Oil Corp.3 4 0 -
Is CJ.TO or ATH.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.480, which suggesting that the stock is 47.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Athabasca Oil Corp. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.147%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or ATH.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Athabasca Oil Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Athabasca Oil Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or ATH.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Athabasca Oil Corp. quarterly revenues of $321.5M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Athabasca Oil Corp.'s net income of $70.1M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Athabasca Oil Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.06x versus 2.49x for Athabasca Oil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.06x 18.04x $104.2M $13.8M ATH.TOAthabasca Oil Corp.2.49x 7.39x $321.5M $70.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or BIR.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -9.66%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or BIR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 2.95%. On the other hand Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.90 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 -
Is CJ.TO or BIR.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.480, which suggesting that the stock is 47.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.751%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or BIR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays out 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or BIR.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $146.2M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is higher than Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.06x versus 2.92x for Birchcliff Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.06x 18.04x $104.2M $13.8M BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Baytex Energy Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 4.28%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Baytex Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.22.22% $0.04 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 2.95%. On the other hand Baytex Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.05 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Baytex Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Baytex Energy Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.3 4 0 -
Is CJ.TO or BTE.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.480, which suggesting that the stock is 47.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baytex Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.147%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Baytex Energy Corp. offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp. pays out 30.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Baytex Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or BTE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Baytex Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $746.4M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Baytex Energy Corp.'s net income of $32M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Baytex Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.06x versus 1.17x for Baytex Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.06x 18.04x $104.2M $13.8M BTE.TOBaytex Energy Corp.1.17x 16.59x $746.4M $32M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or OBE.TO?
Obsidian Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 14.7%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -16.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B OBE.TOObsidian Energy Ltd.12.6% $0.24 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or OBE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 2.95%. On the other hand Obsidian Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that Obsidian Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Obsidian Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 OBE.TOObsidian Energy Ltd.1 3 0 -
Is CJ.TO or OBE.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.480, which suggesting that the stock is 47.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Obsidian Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.727%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or OBE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Obsidian Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Obsidian Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or OBE.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Obsidian Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $114.3M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s net income of $16.8M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Obsidian Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.06x versus 1.02x for Obsidian Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.06x 18.04x $104.2M $13.8M OBE.TOObsidian Energy Ltd.1.02x 6.02x $114.3M $16.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CJ.TO or PEY.TO?
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 41.47%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.42% beat Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.09 $1.1B PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.26.16% $0.45 $4B -
What do Analysts Say About CJ.TO or PEY.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 2.95%. On the other hand Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $24.09 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.0 5 0 PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4 4 0 -
Is CJ.TO or PEY.TO More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.480, which suggesting that the stock is 47.954% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.4%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CJ.TO or PEY.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.43%. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. pays out 92.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CJ.TO or PEY.TO?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $218.8M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $13.8M is lower than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s net income of $90.7M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.06x versus 4.42x for Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CJ.TOCardinal Energy Ltd.3.06x 18.04x $104.2M $13.8M PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4.42x 11.83x $218.8M $90.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
