Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
47
BIR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.80
Seasonality move
:
9.21%
Day range:
$7.80 - $8.19
52-week range:
$4.53 - $8.19
Dividend yield:
2.38%
P/E ratio:
29.90x
P/S ratio:
3.27x
P/B ratio:
0.98x
Volume:
2.2M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
58.85%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$601.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.27
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$155.8M | $0.09 | -27.96% | -38.08% | $8.52 |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$1.4B | $0.57 | 5.43% | -11.62% | $30.94 |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$79.2M | $0.16 | -- | -3.15% | $16.23 |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$152.5M | $0.51 | 29.94% | -30.58% | $27.38 |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$352.4M | $0.47 | 69.27% | 72.76% | $23.18 |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$264M | $0.63 | 11.42% | 73.26% | $20.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$7.99 | $8.52 | $2.2B | 29.90x | $0.03 | 2.38% | 3.27x |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$26.76 | $30.94 | $15.4B | 11.34x | $0.19 | 2.84% | 2.68x |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$15.24 | $16.23 | $2.5B | 18.94x | $0.09 | 7.09% | 7.69x |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$24.60 | $27.38 | $1.1B | 9.56x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.88x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$23.16 | $23.18 | $4.7B | 12.56x | $0.11 | 5.7% | 4.69x |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$14.82 | $20.50 | $545.8M | 9.31x | $0.10 | 2.63% | 0.56x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
22.27% | -0.238 | 40.62% | 0.66x |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
31.93% | -0.354 | 27.09% | 0.36x |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
21.6% | 0.973 | 13.26% | 1.54x |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
19.25% | 1.006 | 19.95% | 1.02x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
30.96% | -0.858 | 34.51% | 0.36x |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
14.99% | 2.059 | 20.3% | 0.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$14.1M | $4.7M | 2.55% | 3.29% | 3.24% | $6.6M |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$369.5M | $345.1M | 12.84% | 17.2% | 24.98% | $216.6M |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$45.1M | $38.5M | 9.83% | 12.47% | 51.83% | $54.2M |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$45.3M | $35.8M | 11.35% | 14.93% | 24.91% | $13.1M |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$57.3M | $47M | 9.22% | 13.71% | 21.5% | $103.3M |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$34.4M | $18.8M | 8.63% | 10.49% | 7.22% | $39M |
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
ARC Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 15.52%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat ARC Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.26.74% $0.37 $12.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand ARC Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.94 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that ARC Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe ARC Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.13 1 0 -
Is BIR.TO or ARX.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 48.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ARC Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.42%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. ARC Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd. pays out 37.04% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than ARC Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than ARC Resources Ltd.'s net income of $214.4M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while ARC Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 3.27x versus 2.68x for ARC Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.2.68x 11.34x $1.4B $214.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Freehold Royalties Ltd. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 45.93%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.60.68% $0.21 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Freehold Royalties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.23 which suggests that it could grow by 6.49%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Freehold Royalties Ltd., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Freehold Royalties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.4 6 0 -
Is BIR.TO or FRU.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 48.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freehold Royalties Ltd. has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.504%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Freehold Royalties Ltd. offers a yield of 7.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Freehold Royalties Ltd. pays out 109.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are larger than Freehold Royalties Ltd. quarterly revenues of $74.4M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s net income of $34.2M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 3.27x versus 7.69x for Freehold Royalties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.7.69x 18.94x $74.4M $34.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or KEC.TO?
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 12.59%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 14.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.31.48% $0.39 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or KEC.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 11.28%. Given that Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.0 1 0 -
Is BIR.TO or KEC.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 48.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or KEC.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or KEC.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are larger than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $143.8M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s net income of $18.1M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 3.27x versus 1.88x for Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.1.88x 9.56x $143.8M $18.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 41.47%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.26.16% $0.45 $4B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.18 which suggests that it could grow by 0.09%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4 4 0 -
Is BIR.TO or PEY.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 48.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.445%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. offers a yield of 5.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. pays out 92.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $218.8M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s net income of $90.7M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 3.27x versus 4.69x for Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4.69x 12.56x $218.8M $90.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 5.59%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.52, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Total Energy Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38.33%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is BIR.TO or TOT.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 48.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.228%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Total Energy Services, Inc. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays out 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $260.7M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Total Energy Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 3.27x versus 0.56x for Total Energy Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
