Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Sell
46
BIR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.13
Seasonality move
:
13.89%
Day range:
$7.00 - $7.14
52-week range:
$4.89 - $8.19
Dividend yield:
1.68%
P/E ratio:
26.68x
P/S ratio:
2.92x
P/B ratio:
0.88x
Volume:
697.2K
Avg. volume:
969.1K
1-year change:
20.85%
Market cap:
$1.9B
Revenue:
$601.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.27
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$155.8M | $0.08 | -27.96% | -38.08% | $8.90 |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$1.6B | $0.37 | -0.53% | -46.82% | $31.00 |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$79.2M | $0.16 | -- | -3.15% | $16.56 |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$393.4M | $0.67 | 69.27% | 72.76% | $24.09 |
|
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
|
$189M | $0.31 | -62.91% | -47.46% | $27.28 |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$289M | $0.63 | 12.23% | 73.26% | $20.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$7.13 | $8.90 | $1.9B | 26.68x | $0.03 | 1.68% | 2.92x |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$23.47 | $31.00 | $13.5B | 9.94x | $0.21 | 3.32% | 2.35x |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$15.03 | $16.56 | $2.5B | 18.68x | $0.09 | 7.19% | 7.59x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$21.82 | $24.09 | $4.4B | 11.83x | $0.11 | 6.05% | 4.42x |
|
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
|
$22.72 | $27.28 | $3.3B | 2.43x | $0.05 | 3.08% | 2.73x |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$15.27 | $20.00 | $562.3M | 9.60x | $0.10 | 2.62% | 0.58x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
22.27% | -0.198 | 40.62% | 0.66x |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
31.93% | -0.430 | 27.09% | 0.36x |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
21.6% | 0.581 | 13.26% | 1.54x |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
30.96% | -1.206 | 34.51% | 0.36x |
|
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
|
0.98% | 0.540 | 0.82% | 3.23x |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
14.99% | 2.749 | 20.3% | 0.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$14.1M | $4.7M | 2.55% | 3.29% | 3.24% | $6.6M |
|
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
|
$369.5M | $345.1M | 12.84% | 17.2% | 24.98% | $216.6M |
|
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
|
$45.1M | $38.5M | 9.83% | 12.47% | 51.83% | $54.2M |
|
PEY.TO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
|
$57.3M | $47M | 9.22% | 13.71% | 21.5% | $103.3M |
|
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
|
$25M | -$7.8M | 43.96% | 44.99% | -4.08% | -$182.1M |
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$34.4M | $18.8M | 8.63% | 10.49% | 7.22% | $39M |
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
ARC Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 15.52%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat ARC Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.26.74% $0.37 $12.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.90, signalling upside risk potential of 24.77%. On the other hand ARC Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.08%. Given that ARC Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe ARC Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.13 2 0 -
Is BIR.TO or ARX.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, which suggesting that the stock is 47.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ARC Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.298%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. ARC Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd. pays out 37.04% of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or ARX.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than ARC Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than ARC Resources Ltd.'s net income of $214.4M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while ARC Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 2.92x versus 2.35x for ARC Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M ARX.TOARC Resources Ltd.2.35x 9.94x $1.4B $214.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Freehold Royalties Ltd. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 45.93%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.60.68% $0.21 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.90, signalling upside risk potential of 24.77%. On the other hand Freehold Royalties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.2%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Freehold Royalties Ltd., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Freehold Royalties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.4 6 0 -
Is BIR.TO or FRU.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, which suggesting that the stock is 47.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freehold Royalties Ltd. has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Freehold Royalties Ltd. offers a yield of 7.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Freehold Royalties Ltd. pays out 109.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or FRU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are larger than Freehold Royalties Ltd. quarterly revenues of $74.4M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s net income of $34.2M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Freehold Royalties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 2.92x versus 7.59x for Freehold Royalties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M FRU.TOFreehold Royalties Ltd.7.59x 18.68x $74.4M $34.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 41.47%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.26.16% $0.45 $4B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.90, signalling upside risk potential of 24.77%. On the other hand Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $24.09 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4 4 0 -
Is BIR.TO or PEY.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, which suggesting that the stock is 47.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.4%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. pays out 92.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or PEY.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $218.8M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s net income of $90.7M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 2.92x versus 4.42x for Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M PEY.TOPeyto Exploration & Development Corp.4.42x 11.83x $218.8M $90.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or POU.TO?
Paramount Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -1.2%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Paramount Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 44.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B POU.TOParamount Resources Ltd.13.08% -$0.02 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or POU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.90, signalling upside risk potential of 24.77%. On the other hand Paramount Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $27.28 which suggests that it could grow by 20.06%. Given that Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Paramount Resources Ltd., analysts believe Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Paramount Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 POU.TOParamount Resources Ltd.5 3 0 -
Is BIR.TO or POU.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, which suggesting that the stock is 47.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.158%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or POU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Paramount Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Resources Ltd. pays out 73.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or POU.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than Paramount Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $191.1M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Paramount Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Paramount Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 2.92x versus 2.73x for Paramount Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M POU.TOParamount Resources Ltd.2.73x 2.43x $191.1M -$2.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 5.59%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M -
What do Analysts Say About BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.90, signalling upside risk potential of 24.77%. On the other hand Total Energy Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.98%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.7 1 0 TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is BIR.TO or TOT.TO More Risky?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.522, which suggesting that the stock is 47.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.184%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Total Energy Services, Inc. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays out 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BIR.TO or TOT.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $146.2M, which are smaller than Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $260.7M. Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M is lower than Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M. Notably, Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Total Energy Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. is 2.92x versus 0.58x for Total Energy Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.2.92x 26.68x $146.2M -$14.1M TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.58x 9.60x $260.7M $14.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
