Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
60
TOT.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.99
Seasonality move
:
12.31%
Day range:
$14.77 - $15.05
52-week range:
$8.40 - $15.30
Dividend yield:
2.63%
P/E ratio:
9.31x
P/S ratio:
0.56x
P/B ratio:
0.92x
Volume:
34.6K
Avg. volume:
56.1K
1-year change:
24.22%
Market cap:
$545.8M
Revenue:
$906.8M
EPS (TTM):
$1.59
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$264M | $0.63 | 11.42% | 73.26% | $20.50 |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$155.8M | $0.09 | -27.96% | -38.08% | $8.52 |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$152.5M | $0.51 | 29.94% | -30.58% | $27.38 |
|
KEL.TO
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
|
$104M | $0.13 | -25.49% | 192.79% | $9.50 |
|
SNM.V
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.
|
$39.6M | $0.00 | -1.45% | -98.62% | -- |
|
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
|
-- | $0.03 | -- | 571.29% | $9.18 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$14.82 | $20.50 | $545.8M | 9.31x | $0.10 | 2.63% | 0.56x |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$7.99 | $8.52 | $2.2B | 29.90x | $0.03 | 2.38% | 3.27x |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$24.60 | $27.38 | $1.1B | 9.56x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.88x |
|
KEL.TO
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
|
$7.89 | $9.50 | $1.6B | 27.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.52x |
|
SNM.V
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.
|
$0.25 | -- | $541.1M | 40.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.71x |
|
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
|
$8.07 | $9.18 | $4B | 12.96x | $0.01 | 1.9% | 2.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
14.99% | 2.059 | 20.3% | 0.83x |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
22.27% | -0.238 | 40.62% | 0.66x |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
19.25% | 1.006 | 19.95% | 1.02x |
|
KEL.TO
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
|
14.34% | 0.847 | 13.64% | 0.45x |
|
SNM.V
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.
|
36.66% | -1.250 | 30.34% | 4.99x |
|
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
|
28.05% | 1.428 | 23.93% | 0.50x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOT.TO
Total Energy Services, Inc.
|
$34.4M | $18.8M | 8.63% | 10.49% | 7.22% | $39M |
|
BIR.TO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
|
$14.1M | $4.7M | 2.55% | 3.29% | 3.24% | $6.6M |
|
KEC.TO
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.
|
$45.3M | $35.8M | 11.35% | 14.93% | 24.91% | $13.1M |
|
KEL.TO
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
|
-$522K | -$5.7M | 4.79% | 5.32% | -5.69% | -$36M |
|
SNM.V
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.
|
$12.4M | $7.8M | 3.1% | 5.52% | 19.5% | $196.7K |
|
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
|
$125.4M | $110.2M | -3.26% | -4.42% | 32.83% | $67.7M |
Total Energy Services, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TOT.TO or BIR.TO?
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -9.66%. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49% beat Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.9.65% -$0.05 $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About TOT.TO or BIR.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 38.33%. On the other hand Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.52 which suggests that it could grow by 6.64%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birchcliff Energy Ltd., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Birchcliff Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.6 2 0 -
Is TOT.TO or BIR.TO More Risky?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birchcliff Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.025%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TOT.TO or BIR.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Birchcliff Energy Ltd. pays out 191.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TOT.TO or BIR.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.7M, which are larger than Birchcliff Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $146.2M. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M is higher than Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$14.1M. Notably, Total Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Birchcliff Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Total Energy Services, Inc. is 0.56x versus 3.27x for Birchcliff Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M BIR.TOBirchcliff Energy Ltd.3.27x 29.90x $146.2M -$14.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns TOT.TO or KEC.TO?
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 12.59%. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49% beat Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 14.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.31.48% $0.39 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TOT.TO or KEC.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 38.33%. On the other hand Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 11.28%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.0 1 0 -
Is TOT.TO or KEC.TO More Risky?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TOT.TO or KEC.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TOT.TO or KEC.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.7M, which are larger than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $143.8M. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M is lower than Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s net income of $18.1M. Notably, Total Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Total Energy Services, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.88x for Kiwetinohk Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M KEC.TOKiwetinohk Energy Corp.1.88x 9.56x $143.8M $18.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns TOT.TO or KEL.TO?
Kelt Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -7.44%. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49% beat Kelt Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M KEL.TOKelt Exploration Ltd.-0.52% -$0.04 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About TOT.TO or KEL.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 38.33%. On the other hand Kelt Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.41%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kelt Exploration Ltd., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Kelt Exploration Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 KEL.TOKelt Exploration Ltd.5 0 0 -
Is TOT.TO or KEL.TO More Risky?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kelt Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 0.517, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.348%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TOT.TO or KEL.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Kelt Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Kelt Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TOT.TO or KEL.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.7M, which are larger than Kelt Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.1M. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M is higher than Kelt Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$7.4M. Notably, Total Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Kelt Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Total Energy Services, Inc. is 0.56x versus 3.52x for Kelt Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M KEL.TOKelt Exploration Ltd.3.52x 27.51x $100.1M -$7.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns TOT.TO or SNM.V?
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 6.47%. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49% beat ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 5.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M SNM.VShaMaran Petroleum Corp.31.11% $0.00 $502.7M -
What do Analysts Say About TOT.TO or SNM.V?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 38.33%. On the other hand ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than ShaMaran Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than ShaMaran Petroleum Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 SNM.VShaMaran Petroleum Corp.1 0 0 -
Is TOT.TO or SNM.V More Risky?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.836%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TOT.TO or SNM.V?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TOT.TO or SNM.V?
Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.7M, which are larger than ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $39.9M. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M is higher than ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2.6M. Notably, Total Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Total Energy Services, Inc. is 0.56x versus 3.71x for ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M SNM.VShaMaran Petroleum Corp.3.71x 40.83x $39.9M $2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns TOT.TO or TVE.TO?
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -74.09%. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49% beat Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.13.18% $0.38 $698.8M TVE.TOTamarack Valley Energy Ltd.37.34% -$0.50 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About TOT.TO or TVE.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 38.33%. On the other hand Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.18 which suggests that it could grow by 13.69%. Given that Total Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd., analysts believe Total Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.2 0 0 TVE.TOTamarack Valley Energy Ltd.5 1 0 -
Is TOT.TO or TVE.TO More Risky?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.908%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TOT.TO or TVE.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Total Energy Services, Inc. pays 23.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. pays out 50.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TOT.TO or TVE.TO?
Total Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.7M, which are smaller than Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $335.8M. Total Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M is higher than Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$248.8M. Notably, Total Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Total Energy Services, Inc. is 0.56x versus 2.99x for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TOT.TOTotal Energy Services, Inc.0.56x 9.31x $260.7M $14.6M TVE.TOTamarack Valley Energy Ltd.2.99x 12.96x $335.8M -$248.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
