VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 5.6%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $184.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.45%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $200.67 which suggests that it could grow by 21.08%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.42x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 2.24%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27% beat PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $184.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.45%. On the other hand PBF Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.77 which suggests that it could grow by 12.25%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.423, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.689%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. PBF Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc. pays out 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.2B, which are larger than PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B is higher than PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while PBF Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.42x versus 0.10x for PBF Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 3.3% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 0.48%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $184.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.45%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $148.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.693%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 35.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.42x versus 0.40x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 9.32%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $184.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.45%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $131.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.35%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil Corp., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than Exxon Mobil Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $32.2B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.42x versus 1.60x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.