VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 5.6%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $196.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $194.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.58%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.285%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.46x versus 0.41x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 13.05%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $196.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.56%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.664%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $262.6M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.46x versus 0.27x for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 2.24%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $196.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand PBF Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.92 which suggests that it could fall by -4.59%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.384%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. PBF Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc. pays out 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while PBF Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.46x versus 0.13x for PBF Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 0.48%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $196.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $151.45 which suggests that it could grow by 5.5%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.557%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 39.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.46x versus 0.45x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.