VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HF Sinclair Corp. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of -0.42%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.34% beat HF Sinclair Corp.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $232.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand HF Sinclair Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.93 which suggests that it could grow by 5.29%. Given that HF Sinclair Corp. has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe HF Sinclair Corp. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair Corp. has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.08%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. HF Sinclair Corp. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.66% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair Corp. pays out 64.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than HF Sinclair Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than HF Sinclair Corp.'s net income of -$27M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.27x while HF Sinclair Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.62x versus 0.42x for HF Sinclair Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 6.02%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.34% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 24.72%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $232.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $232.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.75%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has more downside risk than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.889%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 28.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.9B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.27x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.62x versus 0.57x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 1.11%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.34% beat PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $232.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand PBF Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.46 which suggests that it could fall by -9.84%. Given that PBF Energy, Inc. has more downside risk than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.518%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. PBF Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.66% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc. pays out 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $79M. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.27x while PBF Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.62x versus 0.18x for PBF Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Valero Energy Corp.'s net margin of 8.6%. Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 8.34% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 15.72%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $232.33, signalling downside risk potential of -5.97%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $175.10 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that Valero Energy Corp. has more downside risk than Phillips 66, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.806%.

Valero Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Valero Energy Corp. pays 59.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 44.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34B. Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.2B is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Valero Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.27x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 16.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy Corp. is 0.62x versus 0.54x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.