PBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HF Sinclair has a net margin of -5.69% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -0.06%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $17.69, signalling downside risk potential of -12.11%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $41.32 which suggests that it could grow by 21.13%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.806%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.4B. PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M is lower than HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.07x versus 0.23x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -5.69% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -6.54%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $17.69, signalling downside risk potential of -12.11%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.48 which suggests that it could grow by 0.59%. Given that Delek US Holdings has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Delek US Holdings is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M is lower than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.07x versus 0.09x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -5.69% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -0.24%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $17.69, signalling downside risk potential of -12.11%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $158.39 which suggests that it could grow by 4.97%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 21.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.07x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -5.69% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -1.97%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $17.69, signalling downside risk potential of -12.11%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $141.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.34%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.664% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 43.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.07x versus 0.30x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.