PBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HF Sinclair has a net margin of -3.94% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -3.29%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $45.09 which suggests that it could grow by 34.68%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.239%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.5B. PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M is lower than HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.08x versus 0.23x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -3.94% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of -17.43%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -62.29%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that Delek US Holdings has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Delek US Holdings is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.248%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.4B. PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$413.8M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.08x versus 0.08x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -3.94% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 1.12%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.26 which suggests that it could grow by 13.75%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.08x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -3.94% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 0.91%. PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $24.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.16 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than PBF Energy.

PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.365%.

PBF Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. PBF Energy pays -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, PBF Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 15.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy is 0.08x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.