PARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clean Energy Fuels has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -130.07%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -28.41%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.13, signalling downside risk potential of -22.63%. On the other hand Clean Energy Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.21 which suggests that it could grow by 92.35%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.081%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clean Energy Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Energy Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues of $103.8M. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$135M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Clean Energy Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.25x versus 1.18x for Clean Energy Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -0.06%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.13, signalling downside risk potential of -22.63%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $45.38 which suggests that it could grow by 0.47%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.38%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.25x versus 0.31x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geospace Technologies has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -54.36%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -11.85%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.13, signalling downside risk potential of -22.63%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.592%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geospace Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues of $18M. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than Geospace Technologies's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Geospace Technologies's PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.25x versus 1.40x for Geospace Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -19.45%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -17.13%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.13, signalling downside risk potential of -22.63%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.143%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 26.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$422M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.25x versus 0.48x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.