PARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVR Energy has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -7.47%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat CVR Energy's return on equity of -21.31%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand CVR Energy has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could fall by -14.09%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than CVR Energy.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Energy has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.654%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVR Energy offers a yield of 9.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy pays out 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than CVR Energy quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than CVR Energy's net income of -$123M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while CVR Energy's PE ratio is 324.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.29x for CVR Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -0.06%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $41.32 which suggests that it could grow by 21.13%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.806%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.23x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -6.54%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.48 which suggests that it could grow by 0.59%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.09x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.74% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 1.6%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -4.89% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.05%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $128.91 which suggests that it could grow by 16.22%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$30.4M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.34x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.