PARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 1.77%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of 24.98% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 45.06%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $168.84 which suggests that it could grow by 26.53%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.569%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of $7.5M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.02x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.34x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -3.41%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of 24.98% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -4.5%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 45.06%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $30.23 which suggests that it could grow by 19.02%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than PBF Energy.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.485%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 5.19% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of $7.5M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$285.9M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.02x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.09x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 0.97%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of 24.98% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 10.89%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 45.06%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $141.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.962%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $35.5B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of $7.5M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $346M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.02x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 1.11%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of 24.98% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 45.06%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.39 which suggests that it could grow by 25.91%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.992, which suggesting that the stock is 99.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.739%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $32.9B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of $7.5M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $364M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.02x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.29x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.