DINO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -3.29% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 1.12%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $45.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.61%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.26 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.55x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.36x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of -3.29% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -3.94%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $45.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.61%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $24.31 which suggests that it could grow by 12.07%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than PBF Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.721%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.55x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.08x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -3.29% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 0.02%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $45.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.61%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $138.97 which suggests that it could grow by 8.22%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Phillips 66.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.55x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -3.29% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 0.91%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $45.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.61%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.16 which suggests that it could grow by 12.97%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Valero Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.239% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.365%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.02%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.55x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.