DINO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.54% compared to HF Sinclair Corp.'s net margin of 13.05%. HF Sinclair Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a consensus price target of $60.53, signalling upside risk potential of 20.13%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.38 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that HF Sinclair Corp. has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., analysts believe HF Sinclair Corp. is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc..

HF Sinclair Corp. has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.885%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HF Sinclair Corp. pays 219.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HF Sinclair Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are larger than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. HF Sinclair Corp.'s net income of $402M is higher than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $262.6M. Notably, HF Sinclair Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.31x for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 5.54% compared to HF Sinclair Corp.'s net margin of 2.24%. HF Sinclair Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a consensus price target of $60.53, signalling upside risk potential of 20.13%. On the other hand PBF Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.58 which suggests that it could fall by -8.38%. Given that HF Sinclair Corp. has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe HF Sinclair Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

HF Sinclair Corp. has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.423, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.689%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. PBF Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. HF Sinclair Corp. pays 219.52% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc. pays out 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair Corp.'s is not.

HF Sinclair Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. HF Sinclair Corp.'s net income of $402M is higher than PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M. Notably, HF Sinclair Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while PBF Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.13x for PBF Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 5.54% compared to HF Sinclair Corp.'s net margin of 0.48%. HF Sinclair Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a consensus price target of $60.53, signalling upside risk potential of 20.13%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $149.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.62%. Given that HF Sinclair Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe HF Sinclair Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.693%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. HF Sinclair Corp. pays 219.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair Corp.'s is not.

HF Sinclair Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. HF Sinclair Corp.'s net income of $402M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, HF Sinclair Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 38.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.43x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 5.54% compared to HF Sinclair Corp.'s net margin of 3.3%. HF Sinclair Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a consensus price target of $60.53, signalling upside risk potential of 20.13%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that HF Sinclair Corp. has higher upside potential than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe HF Sinclair Corp. is more attractive than Valero Energy Corp..

HF Sinclair Corp. has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.442%.

HF Sinclair Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. HF Sinclair Corp. pays 219.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair Corp.'s is not.

HF Sinclair Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.2B. HF Sinclair Corp.'s net income of $402M is lower than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, HF Sinclair Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.45x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.