DINO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -0.24%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $161.22 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 23.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -5.69%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -17.4%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $18.46 which suggests that it could fall by -17.25%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than PBF Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.664%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.1B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$401.8M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.08x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 1.6%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $130.32 which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Phillips 66.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 28.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -1.97%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $143.22 which suggests that it could grow by 5.51%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Valero Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 47.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.34x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.