STI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of -43532.98% compared to Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.94%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,054.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.36%. Given that W.W. Grainger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe W.W. Grainger, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.474%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 20.56% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.4K, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $321M. Notably, Solidion Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.47x while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology, Inc. is 1,745.74x versus 2.80x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -43532.98% compared to Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hayward Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.86 which suggests that it could grow by 8.55%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.4K, which are smaller than Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Solidion Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.47x while Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology, Inc. is 1,745.74x versus 3.32x for Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of -43532.98% compared to Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 10.43%. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1092.5%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.37 which suggests that it could grow by 7.28%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.94%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.4K, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $200M. Notably, Solidion Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.47x while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology, Inc. is 1,745.74x versus 1.93x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a net margin of -43532.98% compared to Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solidion Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe Solidion Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.4K, which are larger than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K. Notably, Solidion Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.47x while Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solidion Technology, Inc. is 1,745.74x versus 1,507.63x for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.