WEDG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72% beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.94%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,053.47 which suggests that it could grow by 2.38%. Given that W.W. Grainger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe W.W. Grainger, Inc. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.474%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 20.56% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $321M. Notably, Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. is 1,507.63x versus 2.80x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72% beat Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hayward Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.86 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K is lower than Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. is 1,507.63x versus 3.22x for Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net margin of 10.43%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72% beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1092.5%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.26 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.94%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $200M. Notably, Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. is 1,507.63x versus 1.84x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net margin of -43532.98%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72% beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K is higher than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. is 1,507.63x versus 1,968.51x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.